Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;14(11):665-676.
doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.130. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD

Affiliations
Review

Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD

Edoardo Savarino et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD.
    Savarino E, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Pandolfino JE, Roman S, Gyawali CP; International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function. Savarino E, et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;15(5):323. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2018.32. Epub 2018 Apr 6. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29622813

Abstract

GERD is a common condition worldwide. Key mechanisms of disease include abnormal oesophagogastric junction structure and function, and impaired oesophageal clearance. A therapeutic trial of acid-suppressive PPI therapy is often the initial management, with endoscopy performed in the setting of alarm symptoms and to exclude other conditions. If symptoms persist and endoscopy does not reveal evidence of GERD, oesophageal function tests are performed, including oesophageal manometry and ambulatory reflux monitoring. However, reflux episodes can be physiological, and some findings on endoscopy and manometry can be encountered in asymptomatic individuals without GERD symptoms. The diagnosis of GERD on the basis of functional oesophageal testing has been previously reported, but no updated expert recommendations on indications and the interpretation of oesophageal function testing in GERD has been made since the Porto consensus over a decade ago. In this Consensus Statement, we aim to describe modern oesophageal physiological tests and their analysis with an emphasis on establishing indications and consensus on interpretation parameters of oesophageal function testing for the evaluation of GERD in clinical practice. This document reflects the collective conclusions of the international GERD working group, incorporating existing data with expert consensus opinion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 11;159(18):2161-8 - PubMed
    1. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009 Jul;21(7):718-e41 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1987 Jul;93(1):85-90 - PubMed
    1. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74 - PubMed
    1. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Aug;2(8):665-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms