Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;8(3):250-257.
doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

Occupational Tasks Influencing Lung Function and Respiratory Symptoms Among Charcoal-Production Workers: A Time-Series Study

Affiliations

Occupational Tasks Influencing Lung Function and Respiratory Symptoms Among Charcoal-Production Workers: A Time-Series Study

Walaiporn Pramchoo et al. Saf Health Work. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Tasks involved in traditional charcoal production expose workers to various levels of charcoal dust and wood smoke. This study aimed to identify specific tasks influencing lung function and respiratory symptoms.

Methods: Interviews, direct observation, and task/symptom checklists were used to collect data from 50 charcoal-production workers on 3 nonwork days followed by 11 workdays. The peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured four times per day.

Results: The PEFR was reduced and the prevalence of respiratory symptoms increased over the first 6-7 workdays. The PEFR increased until evening on nonwork days but not on workdays. Loading the kiln and collecting charcoal from within the kiln markedly reduced the PEFR and increased the odds of respiratory symptoms.

Conclusion: Tasks involving entry into the kiln were strongly associated with a short-term drop in the PEFR and the occurrence of respiratory symptoms, suggesting a need for the use of protective equipment and/or the operation of an effective kiln ventilation system.

Keywords: charcoal-production worker; peak expiratory flow rate; respiratory symptoms; wood smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of model-derived daily average PEFR (dm3/min) of charcoal workers on nonwork days (Day 0) and consecutive workdays (Days 1–11). The filled circles and vertical lines represent means and 95% confidence intervals for all workers. Values of PEFR for each day not having a lowercase letter in common differ significantly (p < 0.05, mixed-effects linear regression model in which the worker is the random element). PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of daily prevalence of charcoal workers experiencing respiratory symptoms on nonwork days (Day 0) and consecutive workdays (Days 1–11). Values of prevalence within each symptom not having a lowercase letter in common differ significantly (p < 0.05, Poisson regression model clustered on workers).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of model-derived PEFR (dm3/min) of charcoal workers by task and time of day. The times of day 1–4 refer to morning, midday, evening, and before bed, respectively. The filled circles and vertical lines represent means and 95% confidence intervals for all workers. Values of PEFR within each task for each time not having a lowercase letter in common differ significantly (p < 0.05, mixed-effects linear regression models in which the worker is the random element). PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate.

References

    1. Pritchard C., Molony T., editors. The Kenya charcoal policy handbook. Practical Action Consulting; Rugby, UK: 2011. p. 4.
    1. Department of Energy . Stockholm Environment Institute; Stockholm (Sweden): 2003. Manual for charcoal production in earth kilns in Zambia.
    1. Kato M., DeMarini D.M., Carvalho A.B., Rego M.A., Andrade A.V., Bonfim A.S., Loomis D. World at work: charcoal producing industries in northeastern Brazil. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:128–132. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Union of Concerned Scientists . Union of Concerned Scientists; Cambridge (MA): 2011. The root of the problem-drivers of deforestation: what is driving tropical deforestation today?
    1. Pierson W.E., Koenig J.Q., Bardana E.J. Potential adverse health effects of wood smoke. West J Med. 1989;151:339–342. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources