Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;37(1):185-199.
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2756072. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Single- and Multiple-Shell Uniform Sampling Schemes for Diffusion MRI Using Spherical Codes

Single- and Multiple-Shell Uniform Sampling Schemes for Diffusion MRI Using Spherical Codes

Jian Cheng et al. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

In diffusion MRI (dMRI), a good sampling scheme is important for efficient acquisition and robust reconstruction. Diffusion weighted signal is normally acquired on single or multiple shells in q-space. Signal samples are typically distributed uniformly on different shells to make them invariant to the orientation of structures within tissue, or the laboratory coordinate frame. The Electrostatic Energy Minimization (EEM) method, originally proposed for single shell sampling scheme in dMRI, was recently generalized to multi-shell schemes, called Generalized EEM (GEEM). GEEM has been successfully used in the Human Connectome Project (HCP). However, EEM does not directly address the goal of optimal sampling, i.e., achieving large angular separation between sampling points. In this paper, we propose a more natural formulation, called Spherical Code (SC), to directly maximize the minimal angle between different samples in single or multiple shells. We consider not only continuous problems to design single or multiple shell sampling schemes, but also discrete problems to uniformly extract sub-sampled schemes from an existing single or multiple shell scheme, and to order samples in an existing scheme. We propose five algorithms to solve the above problems, including an incremental SC (ISC), a sophisticated greedy algorithm called Iterative Maximum Overlap Construction (IMOC), an 1-Opt greedy method, a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) method, and a Constrained Non-Linear Optimization (CNLO) method. To our knowledge, this is the first work to use the SC formulation for single or multiple shell sampling schemes in dMRI. Experimental results indicate that SC methods obtain larger angular separation and better rotational invariance than the state-of-the-art EEM and GEEM. The related codes and a tutorial have been released in DMRITool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Sketch map of IMOC
(a) demonstrates MOC algorithm 2 for P-C-S in 𝕊1, where u1, u2 and u3 are selected one by one with a given θ, and the yellow arc denotes the total coverage set. Figures (b) and (c) are sketch maps for the multi-shell case P-C-M. (b) shows the compromise between the covering radius θ0 in the combined shell and the covering radius θs in the s-th shell, and demonstrates the binary search path (the dashed blue line segment) and the obtained covering radii in IMOC. The grey area contains all feasible covering radii, and the red curve denotes all Pareto optimal covering radii. (c) demonstrates MOC for 3 shell case. Three colors denote three shells. The numbers near the points are the selection orders in MOC for the points. Point 1 (i.e., u1,1) is first selected for shell 1, then point 2 (u2,1) for shell 2 and point 3 (u3,1) for shell 3. The red circle around u1,1 denotes its coverage set C(u1,1, θ1) which is added to CS1, and the dashed black circle around u1,1 denotes C(u1,1, θ0) which is added to CS0. Point 4 (u1,2) is selected based on CSs, ∀s = 0, 1, 2, 3.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Effect of discretization
The left figure shows the covering radii of single shell schemes with K samples obtained by methods using two uniform sets with 81 samples and 20481 samples. The right figure shows the covering radii of multi-shell schemes with K × 3 samples, where θs is the mean of covering radii in three shells, and θ0 is the covering radius of the combined shell.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multi-shell sampling schemes with 90 × 3 samples generated by three methods, and the covering radii of 3 shells and the combined shell in schemes shown in Table III. The colors differentiate the sampling points from the three shells. Note that there is a hole area in the scheme by IMOC, which can be fixed by 1-Opt and CNLO.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
First row: full HCP scheme, sub-sampled schemes by MILP and random selection, respectively. Second row: fODFs fields estimated from the data sets corresponding to schemes, where fODF glyphs are colored by directions, the background is the GFA map, and the yellow tubes denote detected peaks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR Diffusion Tensor Spectroscropy and Imaging. Biophysical Journal. 1994;66:259–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuch DS, Reese TG, Wiegell MR, Makris N, Belliveau JW, Wedeen VJ. High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging Reveals Intravoxel White Matter Fiber Heterogeneity. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002;48:577–582. - PubMed
    1. Tuch DS. Q-ball imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2004;52:1358–1372. - PubMed
    1. Cheng J, Ghosh A, Jiang T, Deriche R. Model-free and Analytical EAP Reconstruction via Spherical Polar Fourier Diffusion MRI. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’10); sep 2010; pp. 590–597. - PubMed
    1. Özarslan E, Koay CG, Shepherd TM, Komlosh ME, Ïrfanoğlu MO, Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI: a novel diffusion imaging method for mapping tissue microstructure. NeuroImage. 2013;78:16–32. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms