Multicenter Study
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011469.pub2.
Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Affiliations
- PMID: 28954185
- PMCID: PMC6483710
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011469.pub2
Item in Clipboard
Multicenter Study
Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
.
Abstract
Background: Many adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) experience a psychosocial burden and mental health problems associated with the disease. Diabetes-related distress (DRD) has distinct effects on self-care behaviours and disease control. Improving DRD in adults with T2DM could enhance psychological well-being, health-related quality of life, self-care abilities and disease control, also reducing depressive symptoms.
Objectives: To assess the effects of psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with T2DM.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, BASE, WHO ICTRP Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search was December 2014 for BASE and 21 September 2016 for all other databases.
Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of psychological interventions for DRD in adults (18 years and older) with T2DM. We included trials if they compared different psychological interventions or compared a psychological intervention with usual care. Primary outcomes were DRD, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were self-efficacy, glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure, diabetes-related complications, all-cause mortality and socioeconomic effects.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently identified publications for inclusion and extracted data. We classified interventions according to their focus on emotion, cognition or emotion-cognition. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to compute overall estimates.
Main results: We identified 30 RCTs with 9177 participants. Sixteen trials were parallel two-arm RCTs, and seven were three-arm parallel trials. There were also seven cluster-randomised trials: two had four arms, and the remaining five had two arms. The median duration of the intervention was six months (range 1 week to 24 months), and the median follow-up period was 12 months (range 0 to 12 months). The trials included a wide spectrum of interventions and were both individual- and group-based.A meta-analysis of all psychological interventions combined versus usual care showed no firm effect on DRD (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.07; 95% CI -0.16 to 0.03; P = 0.17; 3315 participants; 12 trials; low-quality evidence), HRQoL (SMD 0.01; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.11; P = 0.87; 1932 participants; 5 trials; low-quality evidence), all-cause mortality (11 per 1000 versus 11 per 1000; risk ratio (RR) 1.01; 95% CI 0.17 to 6.03; P = 0.99; 1376 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence) or adverse events (17 per 1000 versus 41 per 1000; RR 2.40; 95% CI 0.78 to 7.39; P = 0.13; 438 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence). We saw small beneficial effects on self-efficacy and HbA1c at medium-term follow-up (6 to 12 months): on self-efficacy the SMD was 0.15 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.30; P = 0.05; 2675 participants; 6 trials; low-quality evidence) in favour of psychological interventions; on HbA1c there was a mean difference (MD) of -0.14% (95% CI -0.27 to 0.00; P = 0.05; 3165 participants; 11 trials; low-quality evidence) in favour of psychological interventions. Our included trials did not report diabetes-related complications or socioeconomic effects.Many trials were small and were at high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data as well as possible performance and detection biases in the subjective questionnaire-based outcomes assessment, and some appeared to be at risk of selective reporting. There are four trials awaiting further classification. These are parallel RCTs with cognition-focused and emotion-cognition focused interventions. There are another 18 ongoing trials, likely focusing on emotion-cognition or cognition, assessing interventions such as diabetes self-management support, telephone-based cognitive behavioural therapy, stress management and a web application for problem solving in diabetes management. Most of these trials have a community setting and are based in the USA.
Authors' conclusions: Low-quality evidence showed that none of the psychological interventions would improve DRD more than usual care. Low-quality evidence is available for improved self-efficacy and HbA1c after psychological interventions. This means that we are uncertain about the effects of psychological interventions on these outcomes. However, psychological interventions probably have no substantial adverse events compared to usual care. More high-quality research with emotion-focused programmes, in non-US and non-European settings and in low- and middle-income countries, is needed.
Conflict of interest statement
BHC: is receiving living allowances and tuition fees while doing his PhD and this systematic review from Ministry of Education Malaysia and Universiti Putra Malaysia.
RV: an unrestricted grant for a study in type 2 diabetes patients on insulin therapy (support of self‐managment by triggers) is provided by Sanofi.
MIM: none known.
RS: none known.
GR: received honoraria for consultancy (Novo Nordisk) and a grant for an investigator‐initiated study (Sanofi‐aventis).
Figures
Conceptual framework of the influences of cognition and emotion on various aspects of diabetes management
Study flow diagram.
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study (blank cells indicate that the study did not report that particular outcome).
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials (blank cells indicate that the particular outcome was not investigated in some trials).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 3 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 4 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 5 Adverse events.
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 6 Self‐efficacy (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 7 Self‐efficacy (with age subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 8 HbA1c (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 9 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 10 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 11 Systolic blood pressure (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 12 Diastolic blood pressure (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 13 All‐cause mortality.
Comparison 1 Cognition‐focused versus usual care, Outcome 14 All‐cause mortality (with age subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 3 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 4 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 5 Adverse events.
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 6 Self‐efficacy (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 7 Self‐efficacy (with age subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 8 HbA1c (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 9 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 10 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 11 Systolic blood pressure (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 12 Diastolic blood pressure (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 13 All‐cause mortality.
Comparison 2 Cognition‐focused versus enhanced usual care, Outcome 14 All‐cause mortality (with age subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 3 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 4 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 5 Adverse events.
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 6 Self‐efficacy (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 7 Self‐efficacy (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 8 Self‐efficacy (with age subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 9 HbA1c (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 10 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 11 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 12 Systolic blood pressure (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 13 Diastolic blood pressure (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 14 All‐cause mortality.
Comparison 3 Cognition‐focused versus usual and enhanced usual care, Outcome 15 All‐cause mortality (with age subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 3 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 4 Adverse events (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 5 Health‐related quality of life (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 6 Adverse events (with age subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 7 Self‐efficacy (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 8 Self‐efficacy (with types of interventions subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 9 Self‐efficacy (with age subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 10 HbA1c (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 11 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 12 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 13 Systolic blood pressure.
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 14 Diastolic blood pressure.
Comparison 4 Emotion‐cognition versus usual care, Outcome 15 All‐cause mortality.
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 3 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of deliverer subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 4 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 5 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 6 Adverse events.
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 7 Self‐efficacy.
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 8 HbA1c (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 9 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 10 HbA1c (with types of deliverer subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 11 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 12 Systolic blood pressure (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 13 Systolic blood pressure (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 14 Systolic blood pressure (with age subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 15 Diastolic blood pressure (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 16 Diastolic blood pressure (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 5 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 17 Diastolic blood pressure (with age subgroup).
Comparison 6 Emotion‐focused versus cognition‐focused diabetes care, Outcome 1 Adverse events.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 3 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 4 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 5 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 6 Adverse events.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 7 Self efficacy.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 8 HbA1c.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 9 HbA1c (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 10 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 11 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 12 Systolic blood pressure.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 13 Diastolic blood pressure.
Comparison 7 Psychological interventions versus usual and enhanced diabetes care, Outcome 14 All‐cause mortality.
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress.
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 3 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 4 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 5 Health‐related quality of life (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 6 Health‐related quality of life (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 7 Adverse events.
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 8 Self efficacy (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 9 Self efficacy (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 10 HbA1c.
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 11 HbA1c (with types of setting subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 12 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 13 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 14 Systolic blood pressure.
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 15 Diastolic blood pressure.
Comparison 8 Psychological interventions versus usual diabetes care, Outcome 16 All‐cause mortality.
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of intervention subgroup) measured by PAID.
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 3 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 4 Adverse events.
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 5 Self‐efficacy.
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 6 HbA1c.
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 7 HbA1c (with types of intervention subgroup).
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 8 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 9 Psychological interventions versus usual care (trials with low overall risk of bias), Outcome 9 All‐cause mortality.
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress (with types of settings subgroup).
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 2 Diabetes‐related distress (with age subgroup).
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 3 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 4 Adverse events.
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 5 Self‐efficacy.
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 6 HbA1c (with types of settings subgroup).
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 7 HbA1c (with age subgroup).
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 8 Systolic blood pressure (with types of settings subgroup).
Comparison 10 Emotion‐cognition versus cognition‐focused (trials with imputation for missing data), Outcome 9 Diastolic blood pressure (with types of settings subgroup).
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 1 Diabetes‐related distress.
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 2 Health‐related quality of life.
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 3 Adverse events.
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 4 Self‐efficacy.
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 5 HbA1c.
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 6 Systolic blood pressure.
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 7 Diastolic blood pressure.
Comparison 11 Psychological interventions (trials with imputation for missing data) versus usual care, Outcome 8 All‐cause mortality.
Update of
References
References to studies included in this review
Beverly 2013 {published data only}
-
- NCT00895986. Using conversation maps to reinforce self‐care. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00895986 (accessed 28 January 2016).
D'Eramo Melkus 2010 {published data only}
-
- D'Eramo Melkus G, Chyun D, Vorderstrasse A, Newlin K, Jefferson V, Langerman S. The effect of a diabetes education, coping skills training, and care intervention on physiological and psychosocial outcomes in black women with type 2 diabetes. Biological Research for Nursing 2010;12(1):7‐19. [DOI: 10.1177/1099800410369825] - DOI - PubMed
Davies 2008 {published data only}
-
- Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, Campbell MJ, Carey ME, Cradock S, et al. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336(7642):491‐5. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39474.922025] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- ISRCTN17844016. DESMOND (Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed): a randomised controlled trial of a structured group education programme for people newly diagnosed with type two diabetes. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17844016 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Khunti K, Gray LJ, Skinner T, Carey ME, Realf K, Dallosso H, et al. Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow‐up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ 2012;344:e2333. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e2333] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Dennick 2015 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN18442976. Writing for adults with type 2 diabetes. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18442976 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Fisher 2011 {published data only}
-
- NCT00674986. A clinical study to evaluate the use of episodic, intensive blood glucose monitoring in persons with non‐insulin treated type 2 diabetes. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00674986 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Polonsky W, Fisher L, Schikman C, Hinnen D, Parkin C, Jelsovsky Z, et al. The value of episodic, intensive blood glucose monitoring in non‐insulin treated persons with Type 2 Diabetes: design of the Structured Testing Program (STeP) study, a cluster‐randomised, clinical trial [NCT00674986]. BMC Family Practice 2010;11:37. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, Hinnen DA, Parkin CG, Jelsovsky Z, et al. Structured self‐monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin‐treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study. Diabetes Care 2011;34(2):262‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Fisher 2013 {published data only}
-
- NCT00714441. Reducing distress and improving self‐care in diabetes (REDEEM). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00714441 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Gabbay 2013 {published data only}
-
- NCT00308386. DYNAMIC study: diabetes nurse case management and motivational interviewing for change. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00308386 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Stuckey HL, Dellasega C, Graber NJ, Mauger DT, Lendel I, Gabbay RA. Diabetes nurse case management and motivational interviewing for change (DYNAMIC):study design and baseline characteristics in the Chronic Care Model for type 2 diabetes. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2009;30(4):366‐74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.03.002] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Glasgow 2005 {published data only}
-
- Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, Nelson CC, Cutter G, Gaglio B, et al. Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer‐assisted intervention to improve diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2005;28(1):33‐9. [PUBMED: 15616230] - PubMed
-
- Williams GC, Lynch M, Glasgow RE. Computer‐assisted intervention improves patient‐centered diabetes care by increasing autonomy support. Health Psychology 2007;26(6):728‐34. [PUBMED: 18020845] - PubMed
Grillo 2016 {published data only}
-
- NCT01473329. Structured diabetes self‐management education in primary care and metabolic control. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01473329 (accessed 19 October 2016).
Hermanns 2012 {published data only}
-
- NCT00901992. Evaluation of a self‐management oriented diabetes education program for intensified insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes (MEDIAS‐2‐ICT). clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00901992 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Hermanns 2015 {published data only}
-
- Hermanns N, Schmitt A, Gahr A, Herder C, Nowotny B, Roden M, et al. The effect of a diabetes‐specific cognitive behavioral treatment program (DIAMOS) for patients with diabetes and subclinical depression: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2015;38(4):551‐60. [PUBMED: 25605812] - PubMed
-
- NCT01009138. Evaluation of a diabetes‐specific cognitive behavioural treatment for subthreshold depression. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01009138 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Lamers 2011 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN92331982. Depression in chronically ill elderly. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN92331982 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Jonkers CC, Lamers F, Bosma H, Metsemakers JF, Eijk JT. The effectiveness of a minimal psychological intervention on self‐management beliefs and behaviours in depressed chronically ill elderly persons: a randomised trial. International Psychogeriatrics 2012;24(2):288‐97. - PubMed
-
- Jonkers CC, Lamers F, Evers SM, Bosma H, Metsemakers JF, Eijk JT. Economic evaluation of a minimal psychological intervention in chronically ill elderly patients with minor or mild to moderate depression: a randomised trial (the DELTA‐study). International Journal of Technol Assessment in Health Care 2009;25(4):497‐504. - PubMed
-
- Jonkers CC, Lamers F, Evers SM, Bosma H, Eijk JT. Cost‐utility estimates in depression: does the valuation method matter?. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 2010;13(4):189‐97. - PubMed
-
- Lamers F, Jonkers CC, Bosma H, Diederiks JP, Eijk JT. Effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of a minimal psychological intervention to reduce non‐severe depression in chronically ill elderly patients: the design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN92331982]. BMC Public Health 2006;6:161. - PMC - PubMed
Lerman 2009 {published data only}
-
- Lerman I, López‐Ponce A, Villa AR, Escobedo M, Caballero EA, Velasco ML, et al. Pilot study of two different strategies to reinforce self care behaviors and treatment compliance among type 2 diabetes patients from low income strata [Estudio piloto de dos diferentes estrategias para reforzar conductas de autocuidado y adherencia al tratamiento en pacientes de bajos recursos economicos con diabetes tipo 2]. Gaceta Medica de Mexico 2009;145(1):15‐9. [PUBMED: 19256406] - PubMed
Liu 2015 {published data only}
Pibernik‐Okanovic 2015 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN66963621. Psycho‐education physical exercise effects: does treating subsyndromal depression improve depression‐ and diabetes‐related outcomes?. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN05673017 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Pibernik‐Okanović M, Ajduković D, Lovrenčić MV, Hermanns N. Does treatment of subsyndromal depression improve depression and diabetes related outcomes: protocol for a randomised controlled comparison of psycho‐education, physical exercise and treatment as usual. Trials 2011;12:17. [DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-17] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pibernik‐Okanović M, Hermanns N, Ajduković D, Kos J, Prašek M, Šekerija M, Lovrenčić MV. Does treatment of subsyndromal depression improve depression‐related and diabetes‐related outcomes? A randomised controlled comparison of psychoeducation, physical exercise and enhanced treatment as usual. Trials 2015;16:305. [DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0833-8] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vučić Lovrenčić M, Pibernik‐Okanović M, Šekerija M, Prašek M, Ajduković D, Kos J, et al. Improvement in depressive symptoms Is associated with reduced oxidative damage and inflammatory response in type 2 diabetic patients with subsyndromal depression: the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing psychoeducation, physical exercise, and enhanced treatment as usual. International Journal of Endocrinology 2015;2015:210406. [DOI: 10.1155/2015/210406] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Quinn 2011 {published data only}
-
- NCT01107015. Mobile diabetes management. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01107015 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Quinn CC, Gruber‐Baldini AL, Shardell M, Weed K, Clough SS, Peeples M, et al. Mobile diabetes intervention study: testing a personalized treatment/behavioral communication intervention for blood glucose control. Contemp Clin Trials 2009;30(4):334‐46. - PubMed
Rosenbek 2011 {published data only}
-
- NCT00555854. Self‐care behaviour treatment in patients with diabetes ‐ a randomised controlled trial. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00555854 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Rosenbek Minet LK, Wagner L, Lønvig EM, Hjelmborg J, Henriksen JE. The effect of motivational interviewing on glycaemic control and perceived competence of diabetes self‐management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus after attending a group education programme: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2011;54(7):1620‐9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2120-x] - DOI - PubMed
Shibayama 2007 {published data only}
-
- Shibayama T, Kobayashi K, Takano A, Kadowaki T, Kazuma K. Effectiveness of lifestyle counseling by certified expert nurse of Japan for non‐insulin‐treated diabetic outpatients: a 1‐year randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2007;76(2):265‐8. [PUBMED: 17049662] - PubMed
Simmons 2015 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN66963621. RAPSID: Can peer support, delivered as a group or individual intervention, enable people with diabetes and improve their health? A randomised controlled trial of peer support in type 2 diabetes. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN66963621 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Skelly 2009 {published data only}
Spencer 2013 {published data only}
-
- NCT00800410. REACH Detroit partnership family intervention. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00800410 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Spencer MS, Hawkins J, Espitia NR, Sinco B, Jennings T, Lewis C, et al. Influence of a community health worker intervention on mental health outcomes among low‐income Latino and African American adults with type 2 diabetes. Race and Social Problems 2013;5(2):137‐46. [DOI: 10.1007/s12552-013-9098-6] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Sperl‐Hillen 2013 {published data only}
-
- NCT00652509. Journey for control of diabetes study (0431‐111). clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00652509 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Sperl‐Hillen J, Beaton S, Fernandes O, Worley A, Vazquez‐Benitez G, Hanson A, et al. Are benefits from diabetes self‐management education sustained?. American Journal of Managed Care 2013;19(2):104‐12. [PUBMED: 23448107] - PubMed
Sturt 2008 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN06315411. Effectiveness of patient self‐managed structured education for type 2 diabetes (the diabetes manual): a cluster randomised‐controlled trial. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN06315411 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Taylor 2006 {published data only}
-
- Taylor E. Improving the perceived psychological well‐being of seniors with type 2 diabetes through participation in two innovative programs. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2001:1‐99. [UMI Number: DP14197]
Trief 2016 {published data only}
-
- NCT01017523. Diabetes support project: couples intervention (DSP). clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01017523 (accessed 17 October 2016).
-
- Trief PM, Fisher L, Sandberg J, Cibula DA, Dimmock J, Hessler DM, et al. Health and psychosocial outcomes of a telephonic couples behavior change intervention in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39(12):2165‐73. [DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0035] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Van der Wulp 2012 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN91626621. Expert patients as a coach in a self‐management program for newly diagnosed patients with diabetes type two: a randomised controlled trial. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN91626621 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Van Dijk‐de Vries 2015 {published data only}
-
- NTR2764. Implementation of a nurse‐led self‐management support in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients with emotional distress with problems with daily functioning. www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2764 (accessed 28 January 2016).
-
- Dijk‐de Vries A, Bokhoven MA, Winkens B, Terluin B, Knottnerus JA, Weijden T, et al. Lessons learnt from a cluster‐randomised trial evaluating the effectiveness of Self‐Management Support (SMS) delivered by practice nurses in routine diabetes care. BMJ Open 2015;5(6):e007014. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007014] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Weinger 2011 {published data only}
-
- NCT00142922. Breaking down barriers to diabetes self‐care. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00142922 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Welch 2015 {published data only}
-
- NCT02156037. An RCT evaluation of a diabetes dashboard team model in primary care. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02156037 (accessed 28 January 2016).
Whittemore 2004 {published data only}
-
- Whittemore R, Melkus GD, Sullivan A, Grey M. A nurse‐coaching intervention for women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educator 2004;30(5):795‐804. [PUBMED: 15510531] - PubMed
References to studies excluded from this review
Carper 2014 {published data only}
Chiu 2016 {published data only}
-
- Chiu CJ, Hu YH, Wray LA, Beverly EA, Yang YC, Wu JS, Lu FH. Dissemination of evidence‐base minimal psychological intervention for diabetes management in Taiwan adults with type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2016;9(7):14489‐98.
Fisher 2014 {published data only}
Fonda 2009 {published data only}
Friis 2016 {published data only}
Gabbay 2006 {published data only}
-
- Gabbay RA, Lendel I, Saleem TM, Shaeffer G, Adelman AM, Mauger DT, et al. Nurse case management improves blood pressure, emotional distress and diabetes complication screening. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2006;71(1):28‐35. [PUBMED: 16019102] - PubMed
Heisler 2010 {published data only}
Heisler 2014 {published data only}
-
- Heisler M, Choi H, Palmisano G, Mase R, Richardson C, Fagerlin A, et al. Comparison of community health worker‐led diabetes medication decision‐making support for low‐income Latino and African American adults with diabetes using e‐health tools versus print materials: a randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 2014;161(10 Suppl):S13‐22. [DOI: 10.7326/M13-3012] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Imazu 2015 {published data only}
-
- Imazu MFM, Faria BN, Arruda GO, Sales CA, Marcon SS. Effectiveness of individual and group interventions for people with type 2 diabetes [Efetividade das intervenções individual e em grupo junto a pessoas com diabetes tipo 2]. Revista Latino‐Americana de Enfermagem 2015;23(2):200‐7. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Izquierdo 2003 {published data only}
-
- Izquierdo RE, Knudson PE, Meyer S, Kearns J, Ploutz‐Snyder R, Weinstock RS. A comparison of diabetes education administered through telemedicine versus in person. Diabetes Care 2003;26(4):1002‐7. [PUBMED: 12663564] - PubMed
Jung 2015 {published data only}
Lee 2014 {published data only}
-
- Lee GA, Wyatt S, Topliss D, Walker KZ, Stoney R. A study of a pre‐operative intervention in patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery. Collegian 2014;21(4):287‐93. [PUBMED: 25632725] - PubMed
MacPhail 2014 {published data only}
-
- MacPhail M, Mullan B, Sharpe L, MacCann C, Todd J. Using the health action process approach to predict and improve health outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity Targets and Therapy 2014;7:469‐79. [DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S68428] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Mantwill 2015 {published data only}
McMahon 2012 {published data only}
-
- McMahon GT, Fonda SJ, Gomes HE, Alexis G, Conlin PR. A randomized comparison of online‐ and telephone‐based care management with internet training alone in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2012;14(11):1060‐7. [DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0137] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Munshi 2013 {published data only}
Nobis 2015 {published data only}
-
- Nobis S, Lehr D, Ebert DD, Baumeister H, Snoek F, Riper H, et al. Efficacy of a web‐based intervention with mobile phone support in treating depressive symptoms in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2015;38(5):776‐83. [DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1728] - DOI - PubMed
Safford 2015 {published data only}
Samuel‐Hodge 2008 {published data only}
Schoevers 2013 {published data only}
-
- Schroevers MJ, Tovote KA, Keers JC, Links TP, Sanderman R, Fleer J. Individual mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy for people with diabetes: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Mindfulness 2013;6(1):99‐110. [DOI: 10.1007/s12671-013-0235-5] - DOI
Siminerio 2013 {published data only}
Simson 2008 {published data only}
Sinclair 2013 {published data only}
-
- NCT02144909. Partners in care with semi‐structured support group. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02144909 (accessed 1 January 2015).
Skinner 2010 {published data only}
Surwit 2002 {published data only}
-
- Surwit RS, Tilburg MA, Zucker N, McCaskill CC, Parekh P, Feinglos MN, et al. Stress management improves long‐term glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25(1):30‐4. [PUBMED: 11772897] - PubMed
Tang 2014 {published data only}
Tang 2015 {published data only}
Tovote 2014 {published data only}
-
- Tovote KA, Fleer J, Snippe E, Peeters AC, Emmelkamp PM, Sanderman R, Links TP, et al. Individual mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavior therapy for treating depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2014;37(9):2427‐34. [DOI: 10.2337/dc13-2918] - DOI - PubMed
Trief 2011 {published data only}
Van Bastelaar 2011 {published data only}
Van Bastelaar 2012 {published data only}
-
- Bastelaar KM, Pouwer F, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Twisk JW, Snoek FJ. Is a severe clinical profile an effect modifier in a Web‐based depression treatment for adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes? Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(1):e2. [DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1657] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Van Son 2013 {published data only}
-
- Son J, Nyklícek I, Pop VJ, Blonk MC, Erdtsieck RJ, Spooren PF, et al. The effects of a mindfulness‐based intervention on emotional distress, quality of life, and HbA(1c) in outpatients with diabetes (DiaMind): a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2013;36(4):823‐30. [DOI: 10.2337/dc12-1477] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Van Son 2014 {published data only}
-
- Son J, Nyklíček I, Pop VJ, Blonk MC, Erdtsieck RJ, Pouwer F. Mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy for people with diabetes and emotional problems: long‐term follow‐up findings from the DiaMind randomized controlled trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2014;77(1):81‐4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.03.013] - DOI - PubMed
Welch 2011a {published data only}
Welch 2011b {published data only}
-
- Welch G, Zagarins SE, Feinberg RG, Garb JL. Motivational interviewing delivered by diabetes educators: does it improve blood glucose control among poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients?. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2011;91(1):54‐60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.09.036] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Whittemore 2005 {published data only}
-
- Whittemore R, D'Eramo Melkus G, Grey M. Metabolic control, self‐management and psychosocial adjustment in women with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2005;14(2):195‐203. [PUBMED: 15669928] - PubMed
Zagarins 2012 {published data only}
-
- Zagarins SE, Allen NA, Garb JL, Welch G. Improvement in glycemic control following a diabetes education intervention is associated with change in diabetes distress but not change in depressive symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2012;35(3):299‐304. [DOI: 10.1007/s10865-011-9359-z] - DOI - PubMed
References to studies awaiting assessment
Dafoulas 2014 {published data only}
-
- Dafoulas GE, Giata P, Giannakakos H, Stafylas P, Aletras V, Theodorou K, et al. Long‐term tele‐monitoring of patients with DMT2: preliminary results of the Greek pilot of the renewing health multicenter randomised trial. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2014;16(Suppl 1):A26.
-
- NCT01498367. Life‐long tele‐monitoring of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in central Greece (RHCluster2GR). www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01498367 (accessed 17 October 2016).
De Vries 2014 {published and unpublished data}
-
- Vries L, Heijden AA, 't Riet E, Baan CA, Kostense PJ, Rijken M, et al. Peer support to decrease diabetes‐related distress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: design of a randomised controlled trial [protocol]. BMC Endocrine Disorders 2014;14:21. [DOI: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-21] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- NTR3474. Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes. www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3474 (accessed 17 October 2016).
Ebert 2017 {published data only}
-
- DRKS00004748. Internet‐based programme to treat depressive symptoms of patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 [Online‐Programm zur Bewältigung von depressiven Beschwerden bei Personen mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 oder Typ 2]. www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DR... (accessed 1 December 2016).
NCT01578096 {published data only}
-
- NCT01578096. Stress management among Latinos with type 2 diabetes (CALMS‐D). www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01578096 (accessed 1 December 2015).
References to ongoing studies
ACTRN12612000620820 {published data only}
-
- ACTRN12612000620820. Evaluation of an online support program for type 2 diabetes self‐management and dysphoria (depression, anxiety, and diabetes‐specific distress). anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12612000620820 (accessed 19 January 2017).
-
- Cassimatis M, Kavanagh DJ, Hills AP, Smith AC, Scuffham PA, Gericke C, et al. The OnTrack Diabetes web‐based program for type 2 diabetes and dysphoria self‐management: a randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(3):e97. [DOI: 10.2196/resprot.2813; PUBMED: 26242916] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
ACTRN12614001232628 {published data only}
-
- ACTRN12614001232628. Diabetes text message self management support. www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=367369 (accessed 19 January 2017).
ACTRN12615000931572 {published data only}
-
- ACTRN12615000931572. The springboarD trial: trial of a self‐help intervention to improve functioning and emotional well‐being for people with type 2 diabetes. www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368109 (accessed 10 January 2017).
ACTRN12616001010482 {published data only}
-
- ACTRN12616001010482. Pilot randomised control trial of a problem‐solving intervention tailored to quality of life difficulties experienced by patients with diabetic retinopathy. www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371127 (accessed 10 January 2017).
ISRCTN02123133 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN02123133. A web‐based self management programme (HeLP‐Diabetes) for people with type 2 diabetes in primary care. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN02123133 (accessed 10 January 2017).
NCT01612520 {published data only}
-
- NCT01612520. Telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01612520 (accessed 12 October 2016).
NCT01805245 {published data only}
-
- NCT01805245. Mindfulness: a novel approach for the management of diabetes‐related distress. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01805245 (accessed 1 December 2015).
NCT02021591 {published data only}
-
- NCT02021591. Effectiveness study of interactive web application for problem solving in diabetes management. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02021591 (accessed 1 December 2015).
NCT02040038 {published data only}
-
- NCT02040038. Diabetes self‐management & support LIVE. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02040038 (accessed 10 October 2016).
-
- Vorderstrasse AA, Melkus GD, Pan W, Lewinski AA, Johnson CM. Diabetes learning in virtual environments: testing the efficacy of self‐management training and support in virtual environments (randomized controlled trial protocol). Nursing Research 2015;64(6):485‐93. [DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000128] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
NCT02066155 {published data only}
-
- NCT02066155. Ongoing diabetes self‐management support in church‐based settings. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02066155 (accessed 1 December 2015).
NCT02081586 {published data only}
-
- NCT02081586. mHealth skill enhancement plus phone CBT for type 2 diabetes distress medication nonadherence: pilot study. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02081586 (accessed 1 December 2015).
NCT02137720 {published data only}
-
- NCT02137720. Translating telephonic diabetes self‐management support to primary care practice. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02137720 (accessed 1 December 2015).
NCT02370719 {published data only}
-
- NCT02370719. Evaluation of an mHealth behavioural intervention for the self‐management for type 2 diabetes. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02370719 (accessed 1 December 2016).
NCT02488785 {published data only}
-
- NCT02488785. Impact of a virtual diabetes self‐care and education program on diabetes‐related outcomes in Latinos with type 2 diabetes mellitus. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02488785 (accessed 1 December 2016).
NCT02675257 {published data only}
-
- NCT02675257. Depression and diabetes control trial (DDCT). www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02675257 (accessed 1 December 2016).
NCT02730078 {published data only}
-
- NCT02730078. Value‐based emotion‐focused educational programme to reduce diabetes‐related distress (VEMOFIT). www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02730078 (accessed 1 December 2016).
NCT02748239 {published data only}
-
- NCT02748239. Evaluation of a diabetes self‐management education program for non‐intensified insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes (MEDIAS‐2‐CT). www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02748239 (accessed 1 December 2016).
NCT02863523 {published data only}
-
- NCT02863523. Collaborative care management for distress and depression in rural diabetes (COMRADE). www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02863523 (accessed 1 December 2016).
Additional references
ADA 2003
ADA 2014
Aikens 2012
Ajzen 2011
Anderson 2000
Anderson 2002
-
- Anderson RJ, Grigsby AB, Freedland KE, Groot M, McGill JB, Clouse RE, et al. Anxiety and poor glycemic control: a meta‐analytic review of the literature. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 2002;32(3):235‐47. [PUBMED: 12489699] - PubMed
Aspinwall 2005
-
- Aspinwall LG. The psychology of future‐oriented thinking: from achievement to proactive coping, adaptation, and aging. Motivation and Emotion 2005;29(4):203‐35. [DOI: 10.1007/s11031-006-9013-1] - DOI
Attridge 2014
Bandura 1977
-
- Bandura A. Self‐efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977;84(2):191‐215. [PUBMED: 847061] - PubMed
Bandura 1991
-
- Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self‐regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991;50(2):248‐87. [DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L] - DOI
Bandura 1997
-
- Bandura A. Self‐efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Worth Publishers, 1997.
Bandura 2001
-
- Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 2001;52:1‐26. [PUBMED: 11148297] - PubMed
Baumeister 2012
Beatty 2013
Beller 2013
Berry 2015
Bijl 1999
-
- Bijl JV, Poelgeest‐Eeltink AV, Shortridge‐Baggett L. The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self‐efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999;30(2):352‐9. [PUBMED: 10457237] - PubMed
Bland 2011
Bradley 1999
Browne 2013
Burns 2015
Callahan 1994
-
- Callahan CM, Hui SL, Nienaber NA, Musick BS, Tierney WM. Longitudinal study of depression and health services use among elderly primary care patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1994;42(8):833‐8. [PUBMED: 8046192] - PubMed
Celano 2013
Chamnan 2009
Cherrington 2010
Chew 2013
-
- Chew BH, Shariff‐Ghazali S, Lee PY, Cheong AT, Mastura I, Haniff J, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patient profiles, diseases control and complications at four public health facilities‐ a cross‐sectional study based on the Adult Diabetes Control and Management (ADCM) registry 2009. Medical Journal of Malaysia 2013;68(5):397‐404. [PUBMED: 24632869] - PubMed
Chew 2014
Chew 2015a
Chew 2015b
Chew 2015c
-
- Chew BH, Mohd‐Sidik S, Shariff‐Ghazali S. Negative effects of diabetes‐related distress on health‐related quality of life: an evaluation among the adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in three primary healthcare clinics in Malaysia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2015;13:187. [DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0384-4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Chew 2016
Chiang 2014
Clark 2001
-
- Clark NM, Gong M, Kaciroti N. A model of self‐regulation for control of chronic disease. Health Education and Behavior 2001;28(6):769‐82. [PUBMED: 11720277] - PubMed
Coyne 1994
-
- Coyne JC. Self‐reported distress: analog or Ersatz depression?. Psychological Bulletin 1994;116(1):29‐45. [PUBMED: 8078972] - PubMed
Cromheeke 2014
D'Eramo 2010
-
- D'Eramo Melkus G, Chyun D, Vorderstrasse A, Newlin K, Jefferson V, Langerman S. The effect of a diabetes education, coping skills training, and care intervention on physiological and psychosocial outcomes in black women with type 2 diabetes. Biological Research for Nursing 2010;12(1):7‐12. [DOI: 10.1177/1099800410369825] - DOI - PubMed
Das‐Munshi 2007
-
- Das‐Munshi J, Stewart R, Ismail K, Bebbington PE, Jenkins R, Prince MJ. Diabetes, common mental disorders, and disability: findings from the UK National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Psychosomatic Medicine 2007;69(6):543‐50. [PUBMED: 17636148] - PubMed
DCCT Research Group 1988
-
- DCCT Research Group. Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality‐of‐life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). Diabetes Care 1988;11(9):725‐32. [PUBMED: 3066604] - PubMed
Deakin 2005
Duke 2009
Egede 2013
Ehrmann 2015
Fechner‐Bates 1994
-
- Fechner‐Bates S, Coyne JC, Schwenk TL. The relationship of self‐reported distress to depressive disorders and other psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994;62(3):550‐9. [PUBMED: 8063981] - PubMed
Fisher 2007
-
- Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Arean P, Mohr D, Masharani U, et al. Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care 2007;30(3):542‐8. [PUBMED: 17327318] - PubMed
Fisher 2008
Fisher 2010
Fisher 2012
Fitzpatrick 2013
Folkman 2000
-
- Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist 2000;55(6):647‐54. - PubMed
Gary‐Webb 2013
Gask 2011
Ghiadoni 2000
-
- Ghiadoni L, Donald AE, Cropley M, Mullen MJ, Oakley G, Taylor M, et al. Mental stress induces transient endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation 2000;102(20):2473‐8. [PUBMED: 11076819] - PubMed
Gouni‐Berthold 2008
Greenfield 2002
-
- Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Kahn R, Ninomiya J, Griffith JL. Profiling care provided by different groups of physicians: effects of patient case‐mix (bias) and physician‐level clustering on quality assessment results. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002;136(2):111‐21. [PUBMED: 11790062] - PubMed
Hadjiconstantinou 2016
Harkness 2010
Health Quality Ontario 2009a
Health Quality Ontario 2009b
Higgins 2002
-
- Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:1539‐58. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
Higgins 2009
Higgins 2011a
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
Hinder 2012
Holt 2014
Hróbjartsson 2013
-
- Hróbjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, Tendal B, Hilden J, Boutron I, et al. Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2013;185(4):E201‐11. [DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120744] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Hu 2011
Huxley 2006
Ikeda 2014
International Diabetes Federation 2015
-
- International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 7th Edition. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2015.
Ismail 2004
-
- Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe‐Hesketh S. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2004;363(9421):1589‐97. [PUBMED: 15145632] - PubMed
Izard 2008
Kamarudin 2012
-
- Kamarudin MF, Noh KM, Jaafar S. Morbidity profiles at three primary care clinics in Perlis, Malaysia. The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2012;67(4):363‐8. [PUBMED: 23082442] - PubMed
Kasteleyn 2015
Kawamura 2007
-
- Kawamura T, Shioiri T, Takahashi K, Ozdemir V, Someya T. Survival rate and causes of mortality in the elderly with depression: a 15‐year prospective study of a Japanese community sample, the Matsunoyama‐Niigata suicide prevention project. Journal of Investigative Medicine 2007;55(3):106‐14. [PUBMED: 17481379] - PubMed
Kirkham 2010
Liberati 2009
Lloyd 2005
-
- Lloyd C, Smith J, Weinger K. Stress and diabetes: a review of the links. Diabetes Spectrum 2005;18(2):121‐7. [10.2337/diaspect.18.2.121 1944‐7353]
Macaskill 2016
Maeseneer 2008
Mandel 2013
Meader 2014
Mohr 2009
Morley 1998
-
- Morley JE. The elderly Type 2 diabetic patient: special considerations. Diabetic Medicine 1998;15 Suppl 4:S41‐6. [PUBMED: 9868991] - PubMed
Naik 2011
Nakaya 2014
-
- Nakaya N, Kogure M, Saito‐Nakaya K, Tomata Y, Sone T, Kakizaki M, et al. The association between self‐reported history of physical diseases and psychological distress in a community‐dwelling Japanese population: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study. European Journal of Public Health 2014;24(1):45‐9. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt017] - DOI - PubMed
Nicolucci 2013
-
- Nicolucci A, Kovacs Burns K, Holt RI, Comaschi M, Hermanns N, Ishii H, et al. DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross‐national benchmarking of diabetes‐related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 2013;30(7):767‐77. [DOI: 10.1111/dme.12245] - DOI - PubMed
Norris 2001
-
- Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self‐management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001;24(3):561‐87. [PUBMED: 11289485] - PubMed
O'Connor 2009
Pal 2013
Pan 2011
Park 2013
Pessoa 2008
Petrie 2007
-
- Petrie KJ, Jago LA, Devcich DA. The role of illness perceptions in patients with medical conditions. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2007;20(2):163‐7. [PUBMED: 17278916] - PubMed
Peyrot 2005
-
- Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, Snoek FJ, Matthews DR, Skovlund SE. Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross‐National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabetic Medicine 2005;22(10):1379‐85. [PUBMED: PMID: 16176200] - PubMed
Peyrot 2007
-
- Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Behavioral and psychosocial interventions in diabetes: a conceptual review. Diabetes Care 2007;30(10):2433‐40. [PUBMED: 17666457] - PubMed
Piette 2004
-
- Piette JD, Richardson C, Valenstein M. Addressing the needs of patients with multiple chronic illnesses: the case of diabetes and depression. The American Journal of Managed Care 2004;10(2):152‐62. [PUBMED: 15005508] - PubMed
Polonsky 1995
-
- Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE, et al. Assessment of diabetes‐related distress. Diabetes Care 1995;18(6):754‐60. [PUBMED: 7555499] - PubMed
Polonsky 2005
-
- Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care 2005;28(3):626‐31. [PUBMED: 15735199] - PubMed
Powers 2015
-
- Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell MM, Hess Fischl A, et al. Diabetes self‐management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care 2015;38(7):1372‐82. [DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0730] - DOI - PubMed
Quinones 2012
-
- Quinones AR, Richardson J, Freeman M, O'Neil ME, Kansagara D. Group Visits Focusing on Education for the Management of Chronic Conditions in Adults: A Systematic Review: VA Evidence‐based Synthesis Program Reports. Washington DC: Department of Veterans Affairs, 2012. [PUBMED: 24501785] - PubMed
Rane 2011
Rapley 2003
-
- Rapley P, Passmore A, Phillips M. Review of the psychometric properties of the Diabetes Self‐Efficacy Scale: Australian longitudinal study. Nursing and Health Sciences 2003;5(4):289‐97. [PUBMED: 14622381] - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
-
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Ricci‐Cabello 2014
-
- Ricci‐Cabello I, Ruiz‐Pérez I, Rojas‐García A, Pastor G, Rodríguez‐Barranco M, Gonçalves DC. Characteristics and effectiveness of diabetes self‐management educational programs targeted to racial/ethnic minority groups: a systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐regression. BMC Endocrine Disorders 2014;14:60. [DOI: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-60] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Riley 2011
-
- Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta‐analyses. BMJ 2011;342:d549. - PubMed
Robertson 2012
Robertson 2013
Rosenstock 1966
-
- Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1966;44(3):94‐127. [PUBMED: 5967464] - PubMed
Safren 2014
-
- Safren SA, Gonzalez JS, Wexler DJ, Psaros C, Delahanty LM, Blashill AJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for adherence and depression (CBT‐AD) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37(3):625‐33. [DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0816] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
SIGN 2010
-
- Health Improvement Scotland. Management of diabetes: a national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2010 March (updated May 2014). Guideline No 116.
Snoek 2012
-
- Snoek FJ, Kersch NY, Eldrup E, Harman‐Boehm I, Hermanns N, Kokoszka A, et al. Monitoring of Individual Needs in Diabetes (MIND)‐2: follow‐up data from the cross‐national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) MIND study. Diabetes Care 2012;35(11):2128‐32. [DOI: 10.2337/dc11-1326] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Snoek 2015
Soe 2011
Soo 2009
Sperl‐Hillen 2011
Sterne 2011
-
- Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002. - PubMed
Stoop 2014
Stuckey 2014
-
- Stuckey HL, Mullan‐Jensen CB, Reach G, Kovacs Burns K, Piana N, Vallis M, et al. Personal accounts of the negative and adaptive psychosocial experiences of people with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study. Diabetes Care 2014;37(9):2466‐74. [DOI: 10.2337/dc13-2536] - DOI - PubMed
Sturt 2015
-
- Sturt J, Dennick K, Hessler D, Hunter BM, Oliver J, Fisher L. Effective interventions for reducing diabetes distress: systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Diabetes Nursing 2015;12(2):40‐55. [DOI: 10.1179/2057332415Y.0000000004] - DOI
Sullivan 2013
Tan 2015
Thoolen 2009
Uchendu 2017
Van der Heijden 2013
Vermeire 2005
Walker 2012
Wee 2006
-
- Wee HL, Tan CE, Goh SY, Li SC. Usefulness of the Audit of Diabetes‐Dependent Quality‐of‐Life (ADDQoL) questionnaire in patients with diabetes in a multi‐ethnic Asian country. Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24(7):673‐82. [PUBMED: 16802843] - PubMed
Welch 2003
-
- Welch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, Polonsky WH. Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabetic Medicine 2003;20(1):69‐72. [PUBMED: 12519323] - PubMed
Whiting 2011
WHO 1998
-
- Alberti KM, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part I: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabetic Medicine 1998;15:539‐53. - PubMed
WHOQOL Group 1998
-
- WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL‐BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine 1998;28(3):551‐8. [PUBMED: 9626712] - PubMed
Wise 1986
-
- Wise PH, Dowlatshahi DC, Farrant S, Fromson S, Meadows KA. Effect of computer‐based learning on diabetes knowledge and control. Diabetes Care 1986;9(5):504‐8. [PUBMED: 3533475] - PubMed
Woods 1995
-
- Wooks KL. Mega‐trials and management of acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1995;346(8975):611‐4. [PUBMED: 7651008] - PubMed
Worswick 2013
Zhang 2013
-
- Zhang J, Xu CP, Wu HX, Xue XJ, Xu ZJ, Li Y, et al. Comparative study of the influence of diabetes distress and depression on treatment adherence in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross‐sectional survey in the People's Republic of China. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2013;9:1289‐94. [DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S49798] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
