Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Sep 27:2017:bcr2017221342.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221342.

Laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device

Ariel P Santos  1 , Cate Wetzel  2 , Zia Siddiqui  2 , David Shane Harper  2
Affiliations
Case Reports

Laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device

Ariel P Santos et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular long-acting reversible contraceptive device with an estimated rate of use of about 5.3%. It is highly effective but not without complications, one of which is uterine perforation. The patient was a 32-year-old female who presented with nausea, vomiting and right upper quadrant abdominal pain that was tender on palpation. CT scan was performed and they found signs of acute calculous cholecystitis with incidental finding of a migrated IUD in the left lateral mid-abdomen within the peritoneal cavity. She underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed by a successful IUD retrieval. Most uterine perforations occur at the time of insertion; however, partial perforation with subsequent delayed complete perforation may also occur. This case emphasises the importance of a full workup for a missing IUD and that, if incidentally found, IUDs can be removed safely laparoscopically in conjunction with another procedure.

Keywords: general surgery; sexual health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CT scout imaging of the intrauterine device and the retrieved intrauterine device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Laparoscopic images showing dissection of the IUD from the omentum and successful retrieval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boortz HE, Margolis DJ, Ragavendra N, et al. . Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care. Radiographics 2012;32:335–52. 10.1148/rg.322115068 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gill RS, Mok D, Hudson M, et al. . Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review. Contraception 2012;85:15–18. 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turok DK, Gurtcheff SE, Gibson K, et al. . Operative management of intrauterine device complications: a case series report. Contraception 2010;82:354–7. 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.152 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Apfel T, Naghshizadian R, et al. . Laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device embedded in intestine. JSLS 2014;18:e2014.00122 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types