Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
- PMID: 28955550
- PMCID: PMC5573448
- DOI: 10.17096/jiufd.95403
Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the effects of different porcelain surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture mode of orthodontic brackets.
Materials and methods: Seventy feldspathic porcelain disk samples mounted in acrylic resin blocks were divided into seven groups (n=10) according to type of surface treatment: I, Diamond bur; II, Orthosphoric acid (OPA); III, hydrofluoric acid (HFA); IV, sandblasted with aluminum oxide (SB); V, SB+HFA; VI, Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser; VII, Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser. Brackets were affixed to treated all-porcelain surfaces with a silane bonding agent and adhesive resin and subjected to SBS testing. Specimens were evaluated according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure modes were assessed quantitatively under a stereomicroscope and morphologically under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc Tukey test, with the significance level set at 0.05.
Results: The highest SBS values were observed for Group V, with no significant difference between Groups V and III. SBS values for Group I were significantly lower than those of all other groups tested. The porcelain/resin interface was the most common site of failure in Group V (40%) and Group III (30%), whereas other groups showed various types of bond failure, with no specific location pre-dominating, but with some of the adhesive left on the porcelain surfaces (ARI scores 2 or 3) in most cases.
Conclusion: The current findings indicate that a diamond bur alone is unable to sufficiently etch porcelain surfaces for bracket bonding. Moreover, SB and HFA etching used in combination results in a significantly higher shear-bond strength than HFA or SB alone. Finally, laser etching with either an Nd:YAG or Er:YAG laser was found to be more effective and less time-consuming than both HFA acid and SB for the treatment of deglazed feldspathic porcelain.
Keywords: Er:YAG; Nd:YAG; Shear bond strength; sandblasting.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core after different surface treatments.Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Jun;31(6):261-8. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3487. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013. PMID: 23741995 Clinical Trial.
-
Bonding Strength of Orthodontic Brackets on Porcelain Surfaces Etched by Er:YAG Laser.Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Nov;36(11):601-607. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4429. Epub 2018 Sep 18. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018. PMID: 30227092
-
Porcelain laminate veneer conditioning for orthodontic bonding: SEM-EDX analysis.Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Sep;30(7):1829-34. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1682-5. Epub 2014 Oct 26. Lasers Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 25344891
-
Effects of Novel versus Conventional Porcelain Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 6;2022:8246980. doi: 10.1155/2022/8246980. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. PMID: 35036438 Free PMC article.
-
Residual Adhesive Removal Methods for Rebonding of Debonded Orthodontic Metal Brackets: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;14(20):6120. doi: 10.3390/ma14206120. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34683722 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces utilizing different adhesive systems: An in vitro study.J Orthod Sci. 2023 Nov 2;12:73. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_12_23. eCollection 2023. J Orthod Sci. 2023. PMID: 38234642 Free PMC article.
-
Bond Strength and Surface Roughness of Two Ceramics After Metal Bracket Debonding.Turk J Orthod. 2023 Sep 29;36(3):194-198. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.23. Turk J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 37782014 Free PMC article.
-
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jan 3;9(1):14. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9010014. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35049723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic ceramic treated with different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study.Eur Oral Res. 2021 Jan 4;55(1):1-7. doi: 10.26650/eor.20210004. Eur Oral Res. 2021. PMID: 33937755 Free PMC article.
-
Bonding of Clear Aligner Composite Attachments to Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;15(12):4145. doi: 10.3390/ma15124145. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35744204 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116(6):616–620. - PubMed
-
- Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces: Clinical versus laboratory findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(5):592–594. - PubMed
-
- Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(4):387–392. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources