Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan 12;50(1):9-18.
doi: 10.17096/jiufd.95403. eCollection 2016.

Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study

Affiliations
Review

Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study

Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu et al. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of different porcelain surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture mode of orthodontic brackets.

Materials and methods: Seventy feldspathic porcelain disk samples mounted in acrylic resin blocks were divided into seven groups (n=10) according to type of surface treatment: I, Diamond bur; II, Orthosphoric acid (OPA); III, hydrofluoric acid (HFA); IV, sandblasted with aluminum oxide (SB); V, SB+HFA; VI, Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser; VII, Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser. Brackets were affixed to treated all-porcelain surfaces with a silane bonding agent and adhesive resin and subjected to SBS testing. Specimens were evaluated according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure modes were assessed quantitatively under a stereomicroscope and morphologically under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc Tukey test, with the significance level set at 0.05.

Results: The highest SBS values were observed for Group V, with no significant difference between Groups V and III. SBS values for Group I were significantly lower than those of all other groups tested. The porcelain/resin interface was the most common site of failure in Group V (40%) and Group III (30%), whereas other groups showed various types of bond failure, with no specific location pre-dominating, but with some of the adhesive left on the porcelain surfaces (ARI scores 2 or 3) in most cases.

Conclusion: The current findings indicate that a diamond bur alone is unable to sufficiently etch porcelain surfaces for bracket bonding. Moreover, SB and HFA etching used in combination results in a significantly higher shear-bond strength than HFA or SB alone. Finally, laser etching with either an Nd:YAG or Er:YAG laser was found to be more effective and less time-consuming than both HFA acid and SB for the treatment of deglazed feldspathic porcelain.

Keywords: Er:YAG; Nd:YAG; Shear bond strength; sandblasting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1, 2 and 3
Figure 1, 2 and 3
From left to right: An example of porcelain disc, the laser system used in the study and laser treatment of porcelain surface.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Shear Bond Strengths (SBS) values for groups.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Scanning electron photomicrographs of seven groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Hity R, Gustin MP, Bridel N, Morgon L, Grosgogeat B. In vitro orthodontic bracket bonding to porcelain. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(4):505–511. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116(6):616–620. - PubMed
    1. Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, Pietz DM. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: A comparison of bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(1):66–69. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.63. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces: Clinical versus laboratory findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(5):592–594. - PubMed
    1. Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(4):387–392. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources