Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 1;50(2):24-30.
doi: 10.17096/jiufd.39114. eCollection 2016.

Debonding of ceramic brackets by Er:YAG laser

Affiliations

Debonding of ceramic brackets by Er:YAG laser

Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu et al. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. .

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of Er:YAG laser debonding of ceramic brackets on the bond strength and the amount of adhesive resin remnant.

Materials and methods: Twenty human mandibular incisors were randomly divided into two groups of 10 and polycrystalline ceramic brackets (Transcend series 6000, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were bonded on enamel surfaces. Group 1 was the control group in which no laser application was performed prior to the shear bond strength (SBS) testing. In Group 2, Er:YAG was applied in 3W power for 6 seconds using the scanning method. The brackets were tested for SBS with an Instron universal testing machine and results were expressed in megapascals (MPa). The amount of adhesive remnant was evaluated with Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Mean ± standard deviation of SBS values in the control group was 13.42 ±1.23 MPa and 8.47 ±0.71 MPa in the Er:YAG group and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The evaluation of ARI scores demonstrated more adhesive was left on the enamel surface with Er:YAG group.

Conclusion: 3W power Er:YAG laser application with the scanning method to polycrystalline ceramic brackets demonstrated lower bond strengths and higher ARI scores during the debonding procedure.

Keywords: Bracket debonding; Laser; Orthodontic bracket; Shear strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Laser application.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azzeh E, Feldon PJ. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(1):79–83. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98(2):145–153. - PubMed
    1. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Orthodontic brackets. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T, editors. Orthodontic Materials Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Inc.; 2001. pp. 143–172.
    1. Macri RT, de Lima FA, Bachmann L, Galo R, Romano FL, Borsatto MC, Matsumoto MA. Co2 laser as auxiliary in the debonding of ceramic brackets. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(7):1835–1841. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1688-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saito A, Namura Y, Isokawa K, Shimizu N. Co2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(2):869–874. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1482-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources