Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;27(3):616-625.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0160-1. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

Clinical Utility of Expanded Carrier Screening: Reproductive Behaviors of At-Risk Couples

Affiliations

Clinical Utility of Expanded Carrier Screening: Reproductive Behaviors of At-Risk Couples

Caroline E Ghiossi et al. J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) analyzes dozens or hundreds of recessive genes to determine reproductive risk. Data on the clinical utility of screening conditions beyond professional guidelines are scarce. Individuals underwent ECS for up to 110 genes. Five-hundred thirty-seven at-risk couples (ARC), those in which both partners carry the same recessive disease, were invited to participate in a retrospective IRB-approved survey of their reproductive decision making after receiving ECS results. Sixty-four eligible ARC completed the survey. Of 45 respondents screened preconceptionally, 62% (n = 28) planned IVF with PGD or prenatal diagnosis (PNDx) in future pregnancies. Twenty-nine percent (n = 13) were not planning to alter reproductive decisions. The remaining 9% (n = 4) of responses were unclear. Of 19 pregnant respondents, 42% (n = 8) elected PNDx, 11% (n = 2) planned amniocentesis but miscarried, and 47% (n = 9) considered the condition insufficiently severe to warrant invasive testing. Of the 8 pregnancies that underwent PNDx, 5 were unaffected and 3 were affected. Two of 3 affected pregnancies were terminated. Disease severity was found to have significant association (p = 0.000145) with changes in decision making, whereas guideline status of diseases, controlled for severity, was not (p = 0.284). Most ARC altered reproductive planning, demonstrating the clinical utility of ECS. Severity of conditions factored into decision making.

Keywords: Clinical utility; Expanded carrier screening; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Caroline Ghiossi received a stipend for a student internship and has consulted for Counsyl Inc.

Kenny K. Wong, James D. Goldberg, and Gabriel A. Lazarin are employees of Counsyl Inc.

Imran S. Haque is a former employee of Counsyl Inc.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Animal Studies

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant inclusion process. Illustration of total individual patients tested to yield final number of responses meeting inclusion criteria
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Disease severity and action taken/planned based on ECS results

References

    1. Cao A, Rosatelli MC, Monni G, Galanello R. Screening for thalassemia. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2002;29(2):305–328. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8545(01)00006-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Committee Opinion No. 690 (2017). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129(3). doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001951. - PubMed
    1. Cunningham S, Marshall T. Influence of five years of antenatal screening on the paediatric cystic fibrosis population in one region. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1998;78(4):345–348. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.4.345. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edwards JG, Feldman G, Goldberg J, Gregg AR, Norton ME, Rose NC, et al. Expanded Carrier Screening in Reproductive Medicine—Points to Consider. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015;125(3):653–662. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000666. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), (2016) Cambridge, MA (URL: http://exac.broadinstitute.org/variant/3-15686693-G-C) [June 2016].

Publication types