To fund or not to fund?
- PMID: 28956753
- PMCID: PMC5619988
- DOI: 10.7554/eLife.32015
To fund or not to fund?
Abstract
Funding agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.
Keywords: bias; funding agencies; peer review; science policy.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing interests declared.
Similar articles
-
Searching for the one.Elife. 2017 Sep 28;6:e32016. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32016. Elife. 2017. PMID: 28956752 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies from UW-Madison for rescuing biomedical research in the US.Elife. 2015 Jun 30;4:e09305. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09305. Elife. 2015. PMID: 26122792 Free PMC article.
-
Upcoming Implementation of NIH Funding Caps Invites Researcher Feedback.AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2017 Jun;33(6):iii. doi: 10.1089/aid.2017.29004.tjh. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2017. PMID: 28590802 No abstract available.
-
Collaborative funding for NCDs-a model of research funding.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Sep;4(9):725-727. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30184-X. Epub 2016 Jul 23. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 27460309 Review. No abstract available.
-
Opportunities for vaccine research in Europe.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(8):1917-20. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1016680. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015. PMID: 26090718 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Matthews D. UK grant success rates prompt worldwide comparisons. [September 08, 2017];Times Higher Education. 2016 https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/uk-grant-success-rates-prompt-...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources