Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 28;15(9):e2003779.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003779. eCollection 2017 Sep.

The Experimental Design Assistant

Affiliations

The Experimental Design Assistant

Nathalie Percie du Sert et al. PLoS Biol. .

Abstract

Addressing the common problems that researchers encounter when designing and analysing animal experiments will improve the reliability of in vivo research. In this article, the Experimental Design Assistant (EDA) is introduced. The EDA is a web-based tool that guides the in vivo researcher through the experimental design and analysis process, providing automated feedback on the proposed design and generating a graphical summary that aids communication with colleagues, funders, regulatory authorities, and the wider scientific community. It will have an important role in addressing causes of irreproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The EDA was developed as part of an NC3Rs programme. All authors were involved in developing the EDA and NPdS currently works at the NC3Rs.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The Experimental Design Assistant (EDA) workflow.
The workflow is not fixed and different users might prefer to do some steps in a different order. A potential workflow using the different functionalities of the EDA is described as follows: (1) The user starts by drawing a diagram (with nodes and links) representing the experiment they are planning. Assistance is provided in the form of examples, templates, and video tutorials. (2) Information is added into the node properties, providing more details about the specific step of the process represented by each node. (3) The “Critique” functionality (see Table 2) enables the researcher to obtain feedback on the diagram and the design it represents. The feedback might prompt a change in their plans or the addition of missing information. This is an iterative process and the user might go through the first 3 steps a number of times. (4) Once feedback from the critique has been addressed and the user is satisfied with the final design, the analysis method suggested by the system can be reviewed (see Table 2). (5) Depending on how the data will be analysed, a suitable sample size can be calculated using one of the calculators provided within the system. (6) Once the number of animals needed per group is known, the EDA can generate the randomisation sequence. The spreadsheet detailing the group allocation for each animal can be sent directly to a third party nominated by the user, thus blinding the allocation. This enables the researcher to remain unaware of the group allocation until the data have been collected and analysed. (7) Diagrams can be safely shared with colleagues and collaborators at any stage of the process. (8) The user can export a PDF report, which contains key information about the internal validity of the experiment, a summary of the feedback from the system, and the EDA diagram itself. This report can be submitted as part of a grant application, as part of the ethical review process, or, later on, with a journal manuscript. Alternatively, the diagram data can be exported (as an.eda file) and saved locally or used to register the protocol before the experiment is conducted. (9) Once the planning is complete, the experiment is carried out. (10) The diagram can be updated after data collection to enable the user to keep an accurate record (e.g., to record the number of animals analysed if some failed to complete the experiment or if data are missing for other reasons).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Example of an Experimental Design Assistant (EDA) diagram.
EDA diagrams are composed of nodes and links to represent an entire experimental plan. Each node contains properties where specific details are captured (properties are not shown in this picture, but in the EDA they are accessible by clicking on the specific node). This particular example is a simple 2-group comparison. The grey nodes contain high-level information about the experiment, such as the null and alternative hypotheses, the effect of interest (via the experiment node), the experimental unit, or the animal characteristics. The blue and purple nodes represent the practical steps carried out in the laboratory, such as the allocation to groups (allocation node) and the group sizes and role in the experiment (group nodes), the treatments (via the intervention nodes), and the measurements taken (measurement nodes). The green and red nodes represent the analysis, the outcome measures, and the independent variables.

References

    1. Nature editorial. Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility. Nature. 2013;496(7446). Epub 2013/04/24.
    1. Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS. The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(6):e1002165 Epub 2015/06/10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4461318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JP. What does research reproducibility mean? Science translational medicine. 2016;8(341):341ps12 Epub 2016/06/03. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MF, Cuthill IC, Fry D, et al. Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(11):e7824 Epub 2009/12/04. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007824 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Begley CG, Ellis LM. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483(7391):531–3. Epub 2012/03/31. doi: 10.1038/483531a . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources