Using nominal group technique among clinical providers to identify barriers and prioritize solutions to scaling up opioid agonist therapies in Ukraine
- PMID: 28957756
 - PMCID: PMC11884252
 - DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.025
 
Using nominal group technique among clinical providers to identify barriers and prioritize solutions to scaling up opioid agonist therapies in Ukraine
Abstract
Background: Opioid agonist therapies (OAT) like methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment remain markedly under-scaled in Ukraine despite adequate funding. Clinicians and administrators were assembled as part of an implementation science strategy to scale-up OAT using the Network for Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) approach.
Methods: Nominal Group Technique (NGT), a key ingredient of the NIATx toolkit, was directed by three trained coaches within a learning collaborative of 18 OAT clinicians and administrators to identify barriers to increase OAT capacity at the regional "oblast" level, develop solutions, and prioritize local change projects. NGT findings were supplemented from detailed notes collected during the NGT discussion.
Results: The top three identified barriers included: (1) Strict regulations and inflexible policies dictating distribution and dispensing of OAT; (2) No systematic approach to assessing OAT needs on regional or local level; and (3) Limited funding and financing mechanisms combined with a lack of local/regional control over funding for OAT treatment services.
Conclusions: NGT provides a rapid strategy for individuals at multiple levels to work collaboratively to identify and address structural barriers to OAT scale-up. This technique creates a transparent process to address and prioritize complex issues. Targeting these priorities allowed leaders at the regional and national level to advocate collectively for approaches to minimize obstacles and create policies to improve OAT services.
Keywords: Buprenorphine; Implementation science; Methadone; NIATx; Nominal group technique; Opioid agonist treatment (OAT); People who inject drugs (PWID); Structural barriers; Ukraine.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None.
Figures
References
- 
    
- Bojko MJ, Mazhnaya A, Makarenko I, Marcus R, Dvoriak S, Islam Z, & Altice FL (2015). “Bureaucracy & Beliefs”: Assessing the barriers to accessing opioid substitution therapy by people who inject drugs in Ukraine. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 22(3), 255–262. doi:10.3109/09687637.2015.1016397 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Brown VB, & Melchior LA (2008). Women with co-occurring disorders (COD): treatment settings and service needs. J Psychoactive Drugs, Suppl 5, 365–376. - PubMed
 
 
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
              