Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec;11(4):278-286.
doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000301.

Research priorities in cancer cachexia: The University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Research Base Symposium on Cancer Cachexia and Sarcopenia

Richard F Dunne  1 , Karen M Mustian, Jose M Garcia, William Dale, Reid Hayward, Breton Roussel, Mary M Buschmann, Bette J Caan, Calvin L Cole, Fergal J Fleming, Joe V Chakkalakal, David C Linehan, Aram F Hezel, Supriya G Mohile
Affiliations
Review

Research priorities in cancer cachexia: The University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Research Base Symposium on Cancer Cachexia and Sarcopenia

Richard F Dunne et al. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Cancer cachexia remains understudied and there are no standard treatments available despite the publication of an international consensus definition and the completion of several large phase III intervention trials in the past 6 years. In September 2015, The University of Rochester Cancer Center NCORP Research Base led a Symposium on Cancer Cachexia and Sarcopenia with goals of reviewing the state of the science, identifying knowledge gaps, and formulating research priorities in cancer cachexia through active discussion and consensus.

Recent findings: Research priorities that emerged from the discussion included the implementation of morphometrics into clinical decision making, establishing specific diagnostic criteria for the stages of cachexia, expanding patient selection in intervention trials, identifying clinically meaningful trial endpoints, and the investigation of exercise as an intervention for cancer cachexia.

Summary: Standardizing how we define and measure cancer cachexia, targeting its complex biologic mechanisms, enrolling patients early in their disease course, and evaluating exercise, either alone or in combination, were proposed as initiatives that may ultimately result in the improved design of cancer cachexia therapeutic trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest/Disclosures:

JMG received a grant from Aeterna Zentaris and was a consultant for Helsinn Therapeutics.

References

    1. Fearon KC, Voss AC, Hustead DS, Grp CCS. Definition of cancer cachexia: effect of weight loss, reduced food intake, and systemic inflammation on functional status and prognosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jun;83(6):1345–50. - PubMed
    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489–95. - PubMed
    1. Fearon KC. Cancer cachexia: developing multimodal therapy for a multidimensional problem. Eur J Cancer. 2008 May;44(8):1124–32. - PubMed
    1. Lieffers JR, Mourtzakis M, Hall KD, et al. A viscerally driven cachexia syndrome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: contributions of organ and tumor mass to whole-body energy demands. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Apr;89(4):1173–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laviano A, Meguid MM. Nutritional issues in cancer management. Nutrition. 1996 May;12(5):358–71. - PubMed