Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 14;51(3):295-306.
doi: 10.1515/raon-2017-0034. eCollection 2017 Sep.

In Vitro and in vivo Evaluation of Electrochemotherapy with trans-platinum Analogue trans-[PtCl2(3-Hmpy)2]

Affiliations

In Vitro and in vivo Evaluation of Electrochemotherapy with trans-platinum Analogue trans-[PtCl2(3-Hmpy)2]

Simona Kranjc et al. Radiol Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Cisplatin is used in cancer therapy, but its side effects and acquired resistance to cisplatin have led to the synthesis and evaluation of new platinum compounds. Recently, the synthesized platinum compound trans-[PtCl2(3-Hmpy)2] (3-Hmpy = 3-hydroxymethylpyridine) (compound 2) showed a considerable cytotoxic and antitumour effectiveness. To improve compound 2 cytotoxicity in vitro and antitumour effectiveness in vivo, electroporation was used as drug delivery approach to increase membrane permeability (electrochemotherapy).

Materials and methods: In vitro, survival of sarcoma cells with different intrinsic sensitivity to cisplatin (TBLCl2 sensitive, TBLCl2Pt resistant and SA-1 moderately sensitive) was determined using a clonogenic assay after treatment with compound 2 or cisplatin electrochemotherapy. In vivo, the antitumour effectiveness of electrochemotherapy with compound 2 or cisplatin was evaluated using a tumour growth delay assay. In addition, platinum in the serum, tumours and platinum bound to the DNA in the cells were performed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

Results: In vitro, cell survival after treatment with compound 2 electrochemotherapy was significantly decreased in all tested sarcoma cells with different intrinsic sensitivity to cisplatin (TBLCl2 sensitive, TBLCl2Pt resistant and SA-1 moderately sensitive). However, this effect was less pronounced compared to cisplatin. Interestingly, the enhancement factor (5-fold) of compound 2 cytotoxicity was equal in cisplatin-sensitive TBLCl2 and cisplatin-resistant TBLCl2Pt cells. In vivo, the growth delay of subcutaneous tumours after treatment with compound 2 electrochemotherapy was lower compared to cisplatin. The highest antitumour effectiveness after cisplatin or compound 2 electrochemotherapy was obtained in TBLCl2 tumours, resulting in 67% and 11% of tumour cures, respectively. Compound 2 induced significantly smaller loss of animal body weight compared to cisplatin. Furthermore, platinum amounts in tumours after compound 2 or cisplatin electrochemotherapy were approximately 2-fold higher compared to the drug treatment only, and the same increase of platinum bound to DNA was observed.

Conclusions: The obtained results in vitro and in vivo suggest compound 2 as a potential antitumour agent in electrochemotherapy.

Keywords: 3-Hmpy; cisplatin; electrochemotherapy; electroporation; mouse sarcoma; platinum analogue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival of SA-1 sarcoma (A), TBLCI2 sarcoma (B) and TBLCI2Pt sarcoma cells (C) after treatment with cisplatin (CDDP) or compound 2 or cisplatin electrochemotherapy (ECT CDDP) or compound 2 electrochemotherapy (ECT Compound 2), determined using a clonogenic assay. Data are presented as the arithmetic mean and standard error of the mean (AM±SE) of triplicates pooled from three independent experiments. The survival of cells treated with electrochemotherapy was normalized to the survival of cells treated with electric pulses alone. The survival of SA-1, TBLCl2 and TBLCl2Pt cells treated with electric pulses alone was 0.96 ± 0.05, 0.93 ± 0.09 and 0.92 ± 0.10, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tumour growth and animal body weight change after cisplatin or compound 2 electrochemotherapy in mouse sarcoma tumours; SA-1, TBLCl2 and TBLCl2Pt. Mice (6-12 per group) were treated with intratumoural injection of cisplatin (CDDP, 13.3 mmol/kg) or compound 2 (13.3 mmol/kg) or with local application of electric pulses at 1 minute after drug injection (ECT CDDP; ECT Compound 2; 8 pulses, 1300 V/cm, 100 μs, 1 Hz). Data are presented as the arithmetic mean and standard error of the mean (AM±SE) of tumour volumes.*p (< 0.05) significant difference compared to treatment with cisplatin electrochemotherapy
Figure 3
Figure 3
Platinum amount in sarcoma SA-1 tumours (A), platinum amount in the serum (B) and platinum amount bound to DNA in the cells isolated from SA-1 tumours (C). Animals (8 per group) were treated with intratumoural injection of cisplatin (CDDP, 13.3 mM) alone or compound 2 (13.3 mM) alone or with local application of electric pulses 1 minute after intratumoural drug injection (ECT CDDP; ECT Compound 2; 8 pulses, 1300 V/cm, 100 μs, 1 Hz). The data are presented as the arithmetic mean and standard error of the mean (AM±SE) obtained from 8 samples. *p (< 0.05) under (A) and (C) statistically significant difference compared to corresponding drug treatment only; *p (< 0.05) under (B) statistically significant difference compared to cisplatin or cisplatin electrochemotherapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Emens LA, Middleton G.. The interplay of immunotherapy and chemotherapy: harnessing potential synergies. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:436–443. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0064. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riaz N, Sherman E, Koutcher L, Shapiro L, Katabi N, Zhang ZG. et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cetuximab for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Clin Oncol-Canc. 2016;39:27–31. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Izgi K, Iskender B, Sakalar C, Arslanhan A, Yuksek EH, Hizar E. et al. Effects of epirubicin and cisplatin against 4T1 breast cancer cells are enhanced by myrtucommulone-A. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2016 doi: 10.2174/1871520616666160404110543. [Epub ahead of print] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amable L.. Cisplatin resistance and opportunities for precision medicine. Pharmacol Res. 2016;106:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Michels J, Brenner C, Szabadkai G, Harel-Bellan A. et al. Systems biology of cisplatin resistance: past, present and future. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1257. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.428. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources