Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 1;8(8):5261-5274.
doi: 10.1039/c7sc01747b. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

Surface engineering of graphitic carbon nitride polymers with cocatalysts for photocatalytic overall water splitting

Affiliations

Surface engineering of graphitic carbon nitride polymers with cocatalysts for photocatalytic overall water splitting

Guigang Zhang et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

Graphitic carbon nitride based polymers, being metal-free, accessible, environmentally benign and sustainable, have been widely investigated for artificial photosynthesis in recent years for the photocatalytic splitting of water to produce hydrogen fuel. However, the photocatalytic stoichiometric splitting of pure water into H2 and O2 with a molecular ratio of 2 : 1 is far from easy, and is usually hindered by the huge activation energy barrier and sluggish surface redox reaction kinetics. Herein, we provide a concise overview of cocatalyst modified graphitic carbon nitride based photocatalysts, with our main focus on the modulation of the water splitting redox reaction kinetics. We believe that a timely and concise review on this promising but challenging research topic will certainly be beneficial for general readers and researchers in order to better understand the property-activity relationship towards overall water splitting, which could also trigger the development of new organic architectures for photocatalytic overall water splitting through the rational control of surface chemistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of photocatalytic overall water splitting over a semiconductor photocatalyst modified with both H2- and O2-evolution cocatalysts.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Schematic description of the energy diagram of a semiconductor modified with both H2 and O2 evolution cocatalysts under light irradiation for non-sacrificial photocatalytic water splitting. E a1: activation energy without cocatalysts; E a2: activation energy with cocatalysts; ΔG: Gibbs free energy change; ΔG 0: Gibbs free energy change under standard conditions; r: redox reaction process.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of photocatalytic water reduction for H2 evolution in the presence of an electron donor driven by a semiconductor modified with H2 evolution cocatalysts. TEOA: triethanolamine.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Dependence of the H2 evolution rate, when using Pt-loaded g-C3N4 under visible light, on the loading amount of Pt. Reprinted with permission from ref. 56. Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Size distribution of Pt particles prepared by (a) photoreduction (298 K) and (b) H2 reduction (673 K); (c) H2 evolution activities in the presence of an electron donor. Reprinted with permission from ref. 86. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. (a) The rate of H2 production over mpg-C3N4 loaded with different amounts of MoS2 or Pt, (b) TEM image of MoS2/g-C3N4 and (c) illustration of the deposition of layered MoS2 on the surface of g-C3N4 for photocatalytic H2 evolution. Reprinted with permission from ref. 57. Copyright 2013, Wiley-CVH.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. (a) Comparison of the photocatalytic activity of samples with different amounts of Ni(OH)2 loaded on g-C3N4 polymers, (b) cyclic H2-evolution curve for the Ni0.5 sample. Reprinted with permission from ref. 80. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. (a) Structures of Ni-, Co-, and Fe-based cocatalysts and g-C3N4, (b) photocatalytic H2-evolution for different cocatalyst modified g-C3N4 samples. Reprinted with permission from ref. 94. Copyright 2012, Wiley-CVH.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. (A) Comparison of the photocatalytic activities of samples with different loading amounts of graphene on g-C3N4 polymers, (B) proposed mechanism for the enhanced electron transfer process of the graphene/g-C3N4 polymers. Reprinted with permission from ref. 48. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. Schematic illustration of photocatalytic water oxidation for O2 evolution in the presence of an electron acceptor driven by a semiconductor modified with O2 evolution cocatalysts.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11. (a) Schematic illustration of surface modification and bulk doping modification of CoOx with g-C3N4. Photocatalytic water oxidation activities of the g-C3N4, B–Co–g-C3N4 and S–Co–g-C3N4 samples under (b) UV (λ > 300 nm) and (c) visible light (λ > 420 nm) irradiation. Reprinted with permission from ref. 107. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12. (a) TEM image of Pt deposited g-C3N4 polymers prepared by in situ photo-reduction; (b) overall water splitting activities of g-C3N4 polymers deposited with different amounts of Pt; (c) long reaction time overall water splitting by a Pt–Co–g-C3N4 polymer; (d) overall water splitting activities with the light on and off. Reprinted with permission from ref. 110. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13. Time course of the photocatalytic evolution of H2 and O2 using (a) Co3O4/HCNS/Pt and (b) (Co3O4 + Pt)/HCNS under UV irradiation (λ > 300 nm). Reprinted with permission from ref. 40. Copyright 2016, Wiley-CVH.

References

    1. Maeda K., Teramura K., Lu D., Takata T., Saito N., Inoue Y., Domen K. Nature. 2006;440:295. - PubMed
    1. Lewis N., Nocera D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:15729–15735. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen X., Shen S., Guo L., Mao S. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:6503–6570. - PubMed
    1. Hisatomi T., Kubota J., Domen K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:7520–7535. - PubMed
    1. Maeda K. ACS Catal. 2013;3:1486–1503.

LinkOut - more resources