Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 27:4:245-259.
doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.05.006. eCollection 2017.

Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review

Joanna A Ruszkiewicz  1 , Adi Pinkas  1 , Beatriz Ferrer  1 , Tanara V Peres  1 , Aristides Tsatsakis  2 , Michael Aschner  1
Affiliations
Review

Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review

Joanna A Ruszkiewicz et al. Toxicol Rep. .

Abstract

Sunscreen application is the main strategy used to prevent the maladies inflicted by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Despite the continuously increasing frequency of sunscreen use worldwide, the prevalence of certain sun exposure-related pathologies, mainly malignant melanoma, is also on the rise. In the past century, a variety of protective agents against UV exposure have been developed. Physical filters scatter and reflect UV rays and chemical filters absorb those rays. Alongside the evidence for increasing levels of these agents in the environment, which leads to indirect exposure of wildlife and humans, recent studies suggest a toxicological nature for some of these agents. Reviews on the role of these agents in developmental and endocrine impairments (both pathology and related mechanisms) are based on both animal and human studies, yet information regarding the potential neurotoxicity of these agents is scant. In this review, data regarding the neurotoxicity of several organic filters: octyl methoxycinnamate, benzophenone-3 and -4, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, 3-benzylidene camphor and octocrylene, and two allowed inorganic filters: zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, is presented and discussed. Taken together, this review advocates revisiting the current safety and regulation of specific sunscreens and investing in alternative UV protection technologies.

Keywords: 4-Methylbenzylidene camphor; Benzophenone-3; Neurotoxicity; Octocrylene; Octyl methoxycinnamate; Sunscreen; Titanium dioxide; Zinc oxide.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Krause M., Klit A., Blomberg Jensen M., Søeborg T., Frederiksen H., Schlumpf M., Lichtensteiger W., Skakkebaek N.E., Drzewiecki K.T. Sunscreens: are they beneficial for health? An overview of endocrine disrupting properties of UV-filters. Int. J. Androl. 2012;35:424–436. - PubMed
    1. Thompson S.C., Jolley D., Marks R. Reduction of solar keratoses by regular sunscreen use. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;329:1147–1151. - PubMed
    1. Green A., Williams G., Neale R., Hart V., Leslie D., Parsons P., Marks G.C., Gaffney P., Battistutta D., Frost C., Lang C., Russell A. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;354:723–729. - PubMed
    1. Dupuy A., Dunant A., Grob J.J. Randomized controlled trial testing the impact of high-protection sunscreens on sun-exposure behavior. Arch. Dermatol. 2005;141:950–956. - PubMed
    1. Debacq-Chainiaux F., Leduc C., Verbeke A., Toussaint O. UV, stress and aging. Dermatoendocrinology. 2012;4:236–240. - PMC - PubMed