Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;32(11):1749-1756.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749.

Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations

Armen Yuri Gasparyan  1 , Bekaidar Nurmashev  2 , Marlen Yessirkepov  3 , Dmitry A Endovitskiy  4 , Alexander A Voronov  5 , George D Kitas  6   7
Affiliations
Review

Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations

Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Currently available online profiling platforms offer various services for researchers and authors. Opening an individual account and filling it with scholarly contents increase visibility of research output and boost its impact. This article overviews some of the widely used and emerging profiling platforms, highlighting their tools for sharing scholarly items, crediting individuals, and facilitating networking. Global bibliographic databases and search platforms, such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, are widely used for profiling authors with indexed publications. Scholarly networking websites, such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu, provide indispensable services for researchers poorly visible elsewhere on the Internet. Several specialized platforms are designed to offer profiling along with their main functionalities, such as reference management and archiving. The Open Researcher and Contributor Identification (ORCID) project has offered a solution to the author name disambiguation. It has been integrated with numerous bibliographic databases, platforms, and manuscript submission systems to help research managers and journal editors select and credit the best reviewers, and other scholarly contributors. Individuals with verifiable reviewer and editorial accomplishments are also covered by Publons, which is an increasingly recognized service for publicizing and awarding reviewer comments. Currently available profiling formats have numerous advantages and some limitations. The advantages are related to their openness and chances of boosting the researcher impact. Some of the profiling websites are complementary to each other. The underutilization of various profiling websites and their inappropriate uses for promotion of 'predatory' journals are among reported limitations. A combined approach to the profiling systems is advocated in this article.

Keywords: Author; Bibliography as Topic; Information Retrieval; Performance; Profile; Researcher; Scholarly Journal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any institution.

References

    1. Bornmann L. Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements. High Educ. 2017;73:775–787.
    1. Galdino GM, Gotway M. The digital curriculum vitae. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:183–188. - PubMed
    1. Danesh F, Fattahi R, Dayani MH. Stratification of Iranian LIS academics in terms of visibility, effectiveness and scientific and professional performance: research report part 1. J Librarian Inform Sci. 2017;49:191–198.
    1. Paiva CE, Araujo RL, Paiva BS, de Pádua Souza C, Cárcano FM, Costa MM, Serrano SV, Lima JP. What are the personal and professional characteristics that distinguish the researchers who publish in high- and low-impact journals? A multi-national web-based survey. Ecancermedicalscience. 2017;11:718. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pylarinou S, Kapidakis S. Tracking scholarly publishing of hospitals using MEDLINE, Scopus, WoS and Google Scholar. J Hosp Librariansh. 2017;17:209–216.

MeSH terms