Bone marrow biopsy superiority over PET/CT in predicting progression-free survival in a homogeneously-treated cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
- PMID: 28960797
- PMCID: PMC5673915
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1205
Bone marrow biopsy superiority over PET/CT in predicting progression-free survival in a homogeneously-treated cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Abstract
Several studies have reported uneven results when evaluating the prognostic value of bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and PET/CT as part of the staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria and not taking into account selection and collinearity biases in the analysis models might explain part of these discrepancies. To address this issue we have carried a retrospective multicenter study including 268 DLBCL patients with a BMB and a PET/CT available at diagnosis where we estimated both the prognosis impact and the diagnostic accuracy of each technique. Only patients treated with R-CHOP/21 as first line (n = 203) were included in the survival analysis. With a median follow-up of 25 months the estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 76.3% and 82.7% respectively. In a multivariate analysis designed to avoid a collinearity bias with IPI categories, BMB-BMI [bone marrow involvement](+) (HR: 3.6) and ECOG PS > 1 (HR: 2.9) were independently associated with a shorter PFS and three factors, age >60 years old (HR: 2.4), ECOG PS >1 (HR: 2.4), and abnormally elevated B2-microglobulin levels (HR: 2.2) were independently associated with a shorter OS. In our DLBCL cohort, treated with a uniform first-line chemotherapy regimen, BMI by BMB complemented performance status in predicting those patients with a higher risk for relapse or progression. In this cohort BMI by PET/CT could not independently predict a shorter PFS and/or OS.
Keywords: Bone marrow biopsy; PET/CT; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; outcomes research.
© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures


References
-
- El‐Najjar, I. , Barwick T., Avril N., and Montoto S.. 2012. The role of FDG‐PET and bone marrow examination in lymphoma staging. Ann. Oncol. 23(SUPPL. 10):2–4. - PubMed
-
- Conlan, M. G. , Bast M., Armitage J. O., and Weisenburger D. D.. 1990. Bone marrow involvement by non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma: the clinical significance of morphologic discordance between the lymph node and bone marrow. Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 8:1163–1172. - PubMed
-
- Avigdor, A . 2013. Staging DLBCL: bone marrow biopsy or PET‐CT? Blood 122:4–5. - PubMed
-
- Adams, H. J. A. , and Kwee T. C.. 2016. Reply: The Need for Prudence required when using 18F‐FDG PET as reference standard for lymphoma detection. J. Nucl. Med. 58:1354–1355. - PubMed
-
- Adams, H. J. A. , and Kwee T. C.. 2015. Do not abandon the bone marrow biopsy yet in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33:1217. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials