Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;9(3):290-295.
doi: 10.1111/os.12339.

Biomechanical Stability Analysis of a Stand-alone Cage, Static and Rotational-dynamic Plate in a Two-level Cervical Fusion Construct

Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos  1   2 , Leonard I Voronov  1   2 , Michael R Zindrick  2 , Gerard Carandang  1 , Robert M Havey  1   2 , Alexander J Ghanayem  2 , Avinash G Patwardhan  1   2
Affiliations

Biomechanical Stability Analysis of a Stand-alone Cage, Static and Rotational-dynamic Plate in a Two-level Cervical Fusion Construct

Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos et al. Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To test the following hypotheses: (i) anterior cervical discetomy and fusion (ACDF) using stand-alone interbody spacers will significantly reduce the range of motion from intact spine; and (ii) the use of a static or a rotational-dynamic plate will significantly augment the stability of stand-alone interbody spacers, with similar beneficial effect when compared to each other.

Methods: Eleven human cadaveric subaxial cervical spines (age: 48.2 ± 5.4 years) were tested under the following sequence: (i) intact spine; (ii) ACDF at C4 -C5 using a stand-alone interbody spacer; (iii) ACDF at C5 -C6 and insertion of an interbody spacer (two-level construct); and (iv) randomized placement of either a two-level locking static plate or a rotational-dynamic plate.

Results: Insertion of stand-alone cage at C4 -C5 and C5 -C6 caused a significant decrease in the range of motion compared to intact spine (P < 0.05). Placement of both the locking and the rotational dynamic plate further reduced the range of motion at C4 -C5 and C5 -C6 compared to stand-alone cage (P < 0.01). No significant differences in range of motion restriction at either C4 -C5 or C5 -C6 were found when the two plating systems were compared (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Cervical stand-alone interbody spacers caused significant restriction in the range of motion. Both plates significantly augmented the stability of stand-alone interbody spacers, with similar stabilizing effect.

Keywords: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Biomechanics; Plating; Range of motion; Stand-alone cages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic presentation of a traditional static locking plate (A) and Depuy–Synthes Vectra Variable Angle Plating System. After placement, this plate is capable of 28° cranial–caudal angulation and 14° medial–lateral angulation (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The experimental setup. The cervical spine specimen is fixed to the apparatus at the caudal end and is free to move in any plane at the cranial end. A moment is applied. The apparatus allows continuous cycling of the specimen in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The angular motions of the C 3 to C 6 vertebrae relative to C 7 are measured using an optoelectronic motion measurement system. Bi‐axial angle sensors are mounted on each vertebra for optimization of the preload path. A six‐component load cell is placed under the specimen to measure the applied compressive preload and moments (A), fluoroscopic image during flexion extension movements following anterior cervical discectomy, cage placement, and plate insertion at C 4–C 6 (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Two‐level anterior cervical discectomy and stand‐alone cage insertion (A), CSLP (locking) plate placement (B) and Vectra (rotational dynamic) plate placement (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Range of motion at C 4–C 5 in intact spine and following stand‐alone cage insertion. A significant reduction in Flexion/Extension, Lateral Bending and axial rotation was noted compared to intact.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Range of motion at C 5–C 6 in intact spine and following stand‐alone cage insertion. A significant reduction in Flexion/Extension, Lateral bending and axial rotation was noted compared to intact.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Flexion/Extension range of motion in intact spine and following plate placement at C 4–C 6. A significant reduction was noted compared to intact with no difference between the two plating systems.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Lateral bending range of motion in intact spine and following plate placement at C 4–C 6. A significant reduction was noted compared to intact with no difference between the two plating systems.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Axial rotation range of motion in intact spine and following plate placement at C 4–C 6. A significant reduction was noted compared to intact with no difference between the two plating systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson DG, Albert TJ. Bone grafting, implants, and plating options for anterior cervical fusions. Orthop Clin North Am, 2002, 33: 317–328. - PubMed
    1. Mastronardi L, Ducati A, Ferrante L. Anterior cervical fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Preliminary observations in 36 consecutive cases with a minimum 12‐month follow‐up. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2006, 148: 307–312. - PubMed
    1. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Surg Neurol, 2004, 62: 378–385. - PubMed
    1. Profeta G, de Falco R, Ianniciello G, Profeta L, Cigliano A, Raja AI. Preliminary experience with anterior cervical microdiscectomy and interbody titanium cage fusion (Novus CT‐Ti) in patients with cervical disc disease. Surg Neurol, 2000, 53: 417–426. - PubMed
    1. Moon HJ, Kim JH, Kwon TH, Chung HS, Park YK. The effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand‐alone cages at two contiguous levels on cervical alignment and outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2011, 153: 559–565. - PubMed