Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 29;5(3):e35.
doi: 10.2196/medinform.7958.

Impact of Electronic Health Records on Long-Term Care Facilities: Systematic Review

Affiliations

Impact of Electronic Health Records on Long-Term Care Facilities: Systematic Review

Clemens Scott Kruse et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Long-term care (LTC) facilities are an important part of the health care industry, providing care to the fastest-growing group of the population. However, the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in LTC facilities lags behind other areas of the health care industry. One of the reasons for the lack of widespread adoption in the United States is that LTC facilities are not eligible for incentives under the Meaningful Use program. Implementation of an EHR system in an LTC facility can potentially enhance the quality of care, provided it is appropriately implemented, used, and maintained. Unfortunately, the lag in adoption of the EHR in LTC creates a paucity of literature on the benefits of EHR implementation in LTC facilities.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to identify the potential benefits of implementing an EHR system in LTC facilities. The study also aims to identify the common conditions and EHR features that received favorable remarks from providers and the discrepancies that needed improvement to build up momentum across LTC settings in adopting this technology.

Methods: The authors conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and MEDLINE databases. Papers were analyzed by multiple referees to filter out studies not germane to our research objective. A final sample of 28 papers was selected to be included in the systematic review.

Results: Results of this systematic review conclude that EHRs show significant improvement in the management of documentation in LTC facilities and enhanced quality outcomes. Approximately 43% (12/28) of the papers reported a mixed impact of EHRs on the management of documentation, and 33% (9/28) of papers reported positive quality outcomes using EHRs. Surprisingly, very few papers demonstrated an impact on patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, the length of stay, and productivity using EHRs.

Conclusions: Overall, implementation of EHRs has been found to be effective in the few LTC facilities that have implemented them. Implementation of EHRs in LTC facilities caused improved management of clinical documentation that enabled better decision making.

Keywords: benefits; electronic health record; electronic medical record; long-term care; nursing home; patient outcome; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Paper selection process with inclusion and exclusion criteria.

References

    1. WHO. 2012. [2017-09-01]. World Health Day - Ageing and Health - Toolkit for event organizers http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70840/1/WHO_DCO_WHD_2012.1_eng.pdf 6t93QRzA6.
    1. Denton FT, Spencer BG. Chronic health conditions: changing prevalence in an aging population and some implications for the delivery of health care services. Can J Aging. 2010 Mar;29(1):11–21. doi: 10.1017/S0714980809990390. - DOI - PubMed
    1. OECD. 2005. [2017-09-01]. Long-term Care for Older People: OECD study (2001-2004) http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/long-termcareforolderpeopleoecdst... 6t93hpChp.
    1. The Scan Foundation. 2012. Jun, [2017-05-01]. Growing Demand for Long-Term Care in the U.S. (Updated) http://www.thescanfoundation.org/sites/default/files/us_growing_demand_f... 6q8sjG5gS.
    1. Van Eenoo L, Declercq A, Onder G, Finne-Soveri H, Garms-Homolová V, Jónsson PV, Dix OH, Smit JH, van Hout HP, van der Roest HG. Substantial between-country differences in organising community care for older people in Europe-a review. Eur J Public Health. 2016 Apr;26(2):213–9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv152. - DOI - PubMed