Use of culture- and ELISA-based toxin assay for detecting Clostridium Difficile, a neglected pathogen: A single-center study from a tertiary care setting
- PMID: 28966486
- PMCID: PMC5607753
- DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_157_16
Use of culture- and ELISA-based toxin assay for detecting Clostridium Difficile, a neglected pathogen: A single-center study from a tertiary care setting
Abstract
Introduction: Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive spore-bearing anaerobic bacillus increasingly associated with both community- and hospital-acquired colitis and diarrhea. It is the most common identifiable bacterial cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea associated with antibiotic use and one of the most common anaerobic infections. The diagnosis of C. difficile infection includes detection of toxin A/B in stool specimens by direct enzyme immunoassay, culture of pathogen from the stool specimens using a selective agar Cycloserine-Cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA), tissue culture assay, and detection of glutamate dehydrogenase an enzyme produced by C. difficile. With few reports from India on this disease, the present study was planned to throw more light on the prevalence and utility of laboratory diagnostic methods for C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD).
Material and methods: After taking approval from the Ethics Committee, 150 patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea were taken as a study group and fifty patients with exposure to antibiotics but who did not develop diarrhea were taken as controls. Stool specimen was processed for both culture on CCFA and toxin detection by IVD Tox A + B ELISA.
Results: Only four specimens were culture positive, whereas 13 were ELISA positive. All culture-positive isolates were toxigenic. C. difficile was neither isolated nor its toxin detected in the control group. Culture- and toxin-based assays may not detect all cases of CDAD.
Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, culture does not provide any additional yield over toxin assay. Better diagnostic modalities would be required to prove CDAD.
Keywords: Clostridium difficile; ELISA; culture.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
[Investigation of toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitalized patients with diarrhoea at Marmara University Hospital].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Jan;45(1):1-10. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011. PMID: 21341153 Turkish.
-
Diagnostic role of stool culture & toxin detection in antibiotic associated diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile in children.Indian J Med Res. 2005 Dec;122(6):518-24. Indian J Med Res. 2005. PMID: 16518003
-
Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Apr;15(4):330-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01695667. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996. PMID: 8781886
-
Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995 Aug;16(8):459-77. doi: 10.1086/648363. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995. PMID: 7594392 Review.
-
Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Oct;12 Suppl 6:2-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01580.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006. PMID: 16965399 Review.
References
-
- Vaishnavi C. Established and potential risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009;27:289–300. - PubMed
-
- Vaishnavi C. Clostridium difficile infection: Clinical spectrum and approach to management. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2011;30:245–54. - PubMed
-
- Vaishnavi C. Clinical spectrum and pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile associated diseases. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:487–99. - PubMed
-
- Goorhuis A, Van der Kooi T, Vaessen N, Dekker FW, Van den Berg R, Harmanus C, et al. Spread and epidemiology of Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 027/toxinotype III in the Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:695–703. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources