Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 15;34(2):258-266.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx575.

SINCERITIES: inferring gene regulatory networks from time-stamped single cell transcriptional expression profiles

Affiliations

SINCERITIES: inferring gene regulatory networks from time-stamped single cell transcriptional expression profiles

Nan Papili Gao et al. Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Motivation: Single cell transcriptional profiling opens up a new avenue in studying the functional role of cell-to-cell variability in physiological processes. The analysis of single cell expression profiles creates new challenges due to the distributive nature of the data and the stochastic dynamics of gene transcription process. The reconstruction of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) using single cell transcriptional profiles is particularly challenging, especially when directed gene-gene relationships are desired.

Results: We developed SINCERITIES (SINgle CEll Regularized Inference using TIme-stamped Expression profileS) for the inference of GRNs from single cell transcriptional profiles. We focused on time-stamped cross-sectional expression data, commonly generated from transcriptional profiling of single cells collected at multiple time points after cell stimulation. SINCERITIES recovers directed regulatory relationships among genes by employing regularized linear regression (ridge regression), using temporal changes in the distributions of gene expressions. Meanwhile, the modes of the gene regulations (activation and repression) come from partial correlation analyses between pairs of genes. We demonstrated the efficacy of SINCERITIES in inferring GRNs using in silico time-stamped single cell expression data and single cell transcriptional profiles of THP-1 monocytic human leukemia cells. The case studies showed that SINCERITIES could provide accurate GRN predictions, significantly better than other GRN inference algorithms such as TSNI, GENIE3 and JUMP3. Moreover, SINCERITIES has a low computational complexity and is amenable to problems of extremely large dimensionality. Finally, an application of SINCERITIES to single cell expression data of T2EC chicken erythrocytes pointed to BATF as a candidate novel regulator of erythroid development.

Availability and implementation: MATLAB and R version of SINCERITIES are freely available from the following websites: http://www.cabsel.ethz.ch/tools/sincerities.html and https://github.com/CABSEL/SINCERITIES. The single cell THP-1 and T2EC transcriptional profiles are available from the original publications (Kouno et al., 2013; Richard et al., 2016). The in silico single cell data are available on SINCERITIES websites.

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The workflow of SINCERITIES. (A) Input: time-stamped cross-sectional data of gene expression. (B) Step 1: calculation of normalized distribution distance of gene expression distributions over each time step; (C) Step 2: formulation of the GRN inference as a linear regression problem; (D) Output: edge predictions of the GRN
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Performance of SINCERITIES in inferring gold standard GRNs. The AUROC and AUPR values are given in Supplementary Table S1
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Performance comparison among TSNI, GENIE3, JUMP3 and SINCERITIES. (A) AUROC and (B) AUPR values for 10-gene gold standard GRNs. (C) AUROC and (D) AUPR values for 20-gene gold standard GRNs. The AUROC and AUPR values are given in Supplementary Table S3

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altschuler S.J., Wu L.F. (2010) Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? Cell, 141, 559–563. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir E.D. et al. (2013) viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 545–552. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson T.W. (1962) On the distribution of the Two-Sample Cramer-von Mises criterion. Ann. Math. Stat., 33, 1148–1159.
    1. Anderson T.W., Darling D.A. (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain ‘Goodness of Fit’ criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann. Math. Stat., 23, 193–212.
    1. Bacher R. et al. (2016) Design and computational analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Genome Biol., 17, 63.. - PMC - PubMed