Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;11(8):RC01-RC03.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28481.10351. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

Cross Pinning Versus Lateral Pinning in the Management of Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children

Affiliations

Cross Pinning Versus Lateral Pinning in the Management of Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children

Lokesh Gudda Naik et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Closed reduction of supracondylar humerus fractures with K-wires has become the standard line of management with different opinions regarding the technique that is utilized.

Aim: To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of lateral and cross pinning technique in supracondylar fractures of humerus in children.

Materials and methods: A prospective study with 57 cases of displaced fracture supracondylar humerus, treated by lateral (Group A n=28) and cross pinning (Group B n=29), was conducted between May 2013 and May 2015. Independent sample student's t-test was done to assess the parameters like age, follow-up and duration of surgery. The results were expressed as mean with standard deviation and p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: As per the Gartland classification system, 46 (80.7%) patients had Type IIIA and 11 (19.2%) patients had Type IIIB fracture. The average surgical time was 28.3±1.6 minutes in Group A and 30±3.6 minutes in Group B (p=0.02). About, 3.5% patients in Group A had pin loosening. As per the Flynn criteria, 78.6% in Group A and 79.3% in Group B had excellent results.

Conclusion: No significant difference in terms of functional and radiological outcome was observed between both the techniques. Thus, both the techniques have equal results.

Keywords: Fracture fixation; Humerus fracture; K-wire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Radiograph with Lateral K wire Group A.
[Table/Fig-2]:
[Table/Fig-2]:
Radiograph with Cross K wire Group B.

References

    1. Herring JA. Tachdjian’s Pediatric Orthopaedics. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: W.B. Sanders, Fracture about the elbow; 2002. pp. 2139–221.
    1. Kocher MS, Kasser JR, Waters PM, Syder BD, Hresko MT, Hedequist D, et al. Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):706–12. - PubMed
    1. Ramachandran M, Skaggs DL, Crawford HA, Eastwood DM, Lanlode FD, Vitale MG, et al. Delaying treatment of supracondylar fractures in children: has the pendulum swung too far? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(9):1228–33. - PubMed
    1. Kruschemandl I, Aldrian S, Kottstorfer J, Seis A, Thalhammer G, Egkher A. Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis. Int Orthop. 2012;36(9):1893–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pellegrin DM, Brivio A, Pescatori E, Tessari L. Supracondylar humerus fractures in children: Closed reduction and cross pin fixation in prone position. GIOT. 2008;34:199–204.

LinkOut - more resources