Improving the Efficiency of Psychotherapy for Depression: Computer-Assisted Versus Standard CBT
- PMID: 28969439
- PMCID: PMC5848497
- DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17010089
Improving the Efficiency of Psychotherapy for Depression: Computer-Assisted Versus Standard CBT
Abstract
Objective: The authors evaluated the efficacy and durability of a therapist-supported method for computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy (CCBT) in comparison to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
Method: A total of 154 medication-free patients with major depressive disorder seeking treatment at two university clinics were randomly assigned to either 16 weeks of standard CBT (up to 20 sessions of 50 minutes each) or CCBT using the "Good Days Ahead" program. The amount of therapist time in CCBT was planned to be about one-third that in CBT. Outcomes were assessed by independent raters and self-report at baseline, at weeks 8 and 16, and at posttreatment months 3 and 6. The primary test of efficacy was noninferiority on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at week 16.
Results: Approximately 80% of the participants completed the 16-week protocol (79% in the CBT group and 82% in the CCBT group). CCBT met a priori criteria for noninferiority to conventional CBT at week 16. The groups did not differ significantly on any measure of psychopathology. Remission rates were similar for the two groups (intent-to-treat rates, 41.6% for the CBT group and 42.9% for the CCBT group). Both groups maintained improvements throughout the follow-up.
Conclusions: The study findings indicate that a method of CCBT that blends Internet-delivered skill-building modules with about 5 hours of therapeutic contact was noninferior to a conventional course of CBT that provided over 8 additional hours of therapist contact. Future studies should focus on dissemination and optimizing therapist support methods to maximize the public health significance of CCBT.
Keywords: Cognitive Therapy; Computer-Assisted Therapy; Mood Disorders-Depression; Psychotherapy.
Conflict of interest statement
No of the other authors report disclosures or potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Internet-Based Psychotherapy: How Far Can We Go?Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 1;175(3):202-203. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17121297. Am J Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29490495 No abstract available.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. Third. Arlington, VA: Available at http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=24158. Accessed November 27, 2016. - PubMed
-
- Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G, Quigley L, Kleiboer A, Dobson KS. A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2013;58(7):376–385. - PubMed
-
- Cuijpers P, van Straten A, van Oppen P, Andersson G. Are psychological and pharmacologic interventions equally effective in the treatment of adult depressive disorders? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(11):1675–1685. - PubMed
-
- Weitz ES, Hollon SD, Twisk J, et al. Baseline Depression Severity as Moderator of Depression Outcomes Between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(11):1102–1109. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous