Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;48(5):777-789.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002148. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

Polygenic risk for severe psychopathology among Europeans is associated with major depressive disorder in Han Chinese women

A C Edwards  1 , A R Docherty  1 , A Moscati  1 , T B Bigdeli  1 , R E Peterson  1 , B T Webb  1 , S-A Bacanu  1 , J M Hettema  1 , J Flint  2 , K S Kendler  1
Affiliations

Polygenic risk for severe psychopathology among Europeans is associated with major depressive disorder in Han Chinese women

A C Edwards et al. Psychol Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that several major psychiatric disorders are influenced by shared genetic factors. This shared liability may influence clinical features of a given disorder (e.g. severity, age at onset). However, findings have largely been limited to European samples; little is known about the consistency of shared genetic liability across ethnicities.

Method: The relationship between polygenic risk for several major psychiatric diagnoses and major depressive disorder (MDD) was examined in a sample of unrelated Han Chinese women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were generated using European discovery samples and tested in the China, Oxford, and VCU Experimental Research on Genetic Epidemiology [CONVERGE (maximum N = 10 502)], a sample ascertained for recurrent MDD. Genetic correlations between discovery phenotypes and MDD were also assessed. In addition, within-case characteristics were examined.

Results: European-based polygenic risk for several major psychiatric disorder phenotypes was significantly associated with the MDD case status in CONVERGE. Risk for clinically significant indicators (neuroticism and subjective well-being) was also associated with case-control status. The variance accounted for by PRS for both psychopathology and for well-being was similar to estimates reported for within-ethnicity comparisons in European samples. However, European-based PRS were largely unassociated with CONVERGE family history, clinical characteristics, or comorbidity.

Conclusions: The shared genetic liability across severe forms of psychopathology is largely consistent across European and Han Chinese ethnicities, with little attenuation of genetic signal relative to within-ethnicity analyses. The overall absence of associations between PRS for other disorders and within-MDD variation suggests that clinical characteristics of MDD may arise due to contributions from ethnicity-specific factors and/or pathoplasticity.

Keywords: Major depression; polygenic risk; psychopathology; trans-ethnic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interest

None to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Nagelkerke’s pseudo-R2 values for MDD and the melancholic subtype (MEL) for each polygenic risk score source. Values are based on scores weighted using the 0.3 prior in LDpred. Asterisks correspond to p values associated with dropping the score variable from the regression model. *<0.05; **<0.001; ***<0.0001.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Genetic correlations (95% confidence intervals) between discovery phenotypes, listed on the x-axis, with CONVERGE MDD. Analyses were conducted using Popcorn (Brown et al. 2016), which accounts for genetic differences across ethnicities.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, Abecasis GR. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV Fourth Edition. American Psychiatric Association; Washington, DC: 1994.
    1. Andreasen NC, Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Winokur G. Family history method using diagnostic criteria – reliability and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1977;34:1229–1235. - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 1995;57:289–300.
    1. Bigdeli TB, Ripke S, Bacanu SA, Peterson RP, Abdellaoui A, Andlauer TFM, Beekman ATF, Berger K, Blackwood D, Boomsma DI, Breen G, Buttenschøn HN, Byrne EM, Cichon S, Clarke TK, Couvy-Duchesne B, Craddock N, de Geus EJ, Degenhardt F, Dunn EC, Fanous AH, Forstner AJ, Frank J, Gill M, Gordon SD, Grabe HJ, Hamilton SP, Hardiman O, Hayward C, Heath AC, Henders A, Herms S, Hickie IB, Hoffmann P, Homuth G, Hottenga JJ, Ising M, Jansen R, Kloiber S, Knowles JA, Lang M, Li QS, Lucae S, MacIntyre DJ, Madden PA, Martin NG, McGrath PJ, McGuffin P, McIntosh AM, Medland SE, Mehta D, Middeldorp CM, Milaneschi Y, Montgomery GW, Mors O, Müller-Myhsok B, Nauck M, Nyholt DR, Nöthen MM, Owen MJ, Penninx BW, Pergadia ML, Perlis RH, Peyrot WJ, Porteous DJ, Potash JB, Rice JP, Rietschel M, Riley BP, Rivera M, Schoevers R, Schulze TG, Shi J, Shyn SI, Smit JH, Smoller JW, Streit F, Strohmaier J, Teumer A, Treutlein J, Van der Auwera S, van Grootheest G, van Hemert AM, Völzke H, Webb BT, Weissman MM, Wellmann J, Willemsen G, Witt SH, Levinson DF, Lewis CM, Wray NR, Flint J, Sullivan PF, Kendler KS, CONVERGE Consortium, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Genetic effects influencing risk for major depressive disorder in China and Europe. Translational Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1074. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types