The development and validation of a custom built device for assessing frontal knee joint laxity
- PMID: 28970122
- DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.08.053
The development and validation of a custom built device for assessing frontal knee joint laxity
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "The development and validation of a custom built device for assessing frontal knee joint laxity" [The Knee 24 (2017) 1307-1316].Knee. 2019 Jun;26(3):809-810. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 21. Knee. 2019. PMID: 30904324 No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction: This study reports the development and validation of a quantitative technique of assessing frontal knee joint laxity through a custom built device named KLICP. The objectives of this study were to determine: (i) the intra- and inter-rater reliability and (ii) the validity of the device when compared to real time ultrasound.
Methods: Twenty-five participants had their frontal knee joint laxity assessed by the KLICP, by manual varus/valgus tests and by ultrasound. Two raters independently assessed laxity manually by three repeated measurements, repeated at least 48h later. Results were validated by comparing them to the medial and lateral joint space opening measured by the ultrasound. Intraclass correlation coefficients and standard error of measurement reliability were calculated. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between the KLICP and the joint space.
Results: Intra-rater reliability (intra-session) for each rater was good on both sessions (0.91-0.98), intra-rater reliability (inter-sessions) was moderate to good (0.62-0.87), and inter-rater reliability (intra-session) was good (0.75-0.80). There is low agreement for intra-rater (inter-session) and for inter-rater (intra-session) reliability. The KLICP measurement has a significant positive fair to moderate correlation to the ultrasound measurement at the left (r: 0.61, p: 0.01) and right (r: 0.48, p: 0.02) knee in the valgus direction and at the left (r: 0.51, p: 0.01) and right (r: 0.39, p: 0.05) knee in the varus direction. There is low agreement between the KLICP and the RTU.
Conclusions: Reliability and agreement was good only when measured for intra-rater, within session.
Keywords: Coronal plane; Instrument; Quantify; Reliability; Tibiofemoral; Validity.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 May;45(5):595-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei243. Epub 2005 Dec 6. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006. PMID: 16332948
-
Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture.Knee. 2008 Mar;15(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Feb 8. Knee. 2008. PMID: 18261913
-
Inter- and intra-rater reliability for measurement of range of motion in joints included in three hypermobility assessment methods.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 17;19(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2290-5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 30326873 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Reliability of radiographic grading of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.Scand J Rheumatol. 1997;26(3):155-65. doi: 10.3109/03009749709065675. Scand J Rheumatol. 1997. PMID: 9225869 Review.
-
Validity and reliability of two-dimensional video-based assessment to measure joint angles during running: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Biomech. 2023 Aug;157:111747. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111747. Epub 2023 Jul 29. J Biomech. 2023. PMID: 37541054 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical