Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 20;5(2):28.
doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020028.

Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care

Affiliations

Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care

Lene Juel Kjeldsen et al. Pharmacy (Basel). .

Abstract

The objective was to investigate type, frequency and result of clinical outcomes used in studies to assess the effect of clinical pharmacy interventions in inpatient care. The literature search using Pubmed.gov was performed for the period up to 2013 using the search phrases: "Intervention(s)" and "pharmacist(s)" and "controlled" and "outcome(s)" or "effect(s)". Primary research studies in English of controlled, clinical pharmacy intervention studies, including outcome evaluation, were selected. Titles, abstracts and full-text papers were assessed individually by two reviewers, and inclusion was determined by consensus. In total, 37 publications were included in the review. The publications presented similar intervention elements but differed in study design. A large variety of outcome measures (135) had been used to evaluate the effect of the interventions; most frequently clinical measures/assessments by physician and health care service use. No apparent pattern was established among primary outcome measures with significant effect in favour of the intervention, but positive effect was most frequently related to studies that included power calculations and sufficient inclusion of patients (73% vs. 25%). This review emphasizes the importance of considering the relevance of outcomes selected to assess clinical pharmacy interventions and the importance of conducting a proper power calculation.

Keywords: clinical pharmacy; effect; hospital; outcomes; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study selection for the review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Graabaek T., Kjeldsen L.J. Medication reviews by clinical pharmacists at hospitals lead to improved patient outcomes: A systematic review. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013;112:359–373. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christensen M., Lundh A. Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;2:CD008986. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holland R., Desborough J., Goodyer L., Hall S., Wright D., Loke Y.K. Does pharmacist-led medication review help to reduce hospital admissions and deaths in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008;65:303–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03071.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaboli P.J., Hoth A.B., McClimon B.J., Schnipper J.L. Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: A systematic review. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006;166:955–964. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.9.955. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mekonnen A.B., McLachlan A.J., Brien J.A. Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources