Is Portal Venous Pressure or Porto-systemic Gradient Really A Harbinger of Poor Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?
- PMID: 28970711
- PMCID: PMC5620358
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2017.01.114
Is Portal Venous Pressure or Porto-systemic Gradient Really A Harbinger of Poor Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?
Abstract
Background: Portal hyperperfusion as a cause of small for size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains controversial. Portal venous pressure (PVP) is often measured indirectly and may be confounded by central venous pressure (CVP).
Methods: In 42 adult cirrhotics undergoing elective LDLT, PVP was measured by direct canulation of portal vein and porto systemic gradient (PSG) was obtained after subtracting CVP from PVP. None underwent portal inflow modulation. SFSS was looked in 27 patients after excluding 15 with technical complications.
Results: Clinical features of SFSS found in 6 patients, 5 with graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) > 0.8% and PVP < 20 mm of Hg. One with GRWR < 0.8% could truly be labeled as SFSS. Incidence of SFSS was not higher in patients with elevated PVP > 20 mm of Hg (14.3% vs 0%, P = 0.259) or PSG > 13 mm of Hg (33.3% vs 0%, P = 0.111). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was longer in patients with elevated PVP (14.55 vs 9.13 days, P = 0.007) and PSG (16.8 vs 9.72 days, P = 0.009). There was no difference in graft functions, post-operative complications and mortality in first month post-LDLT.
Conclusion: Elevated PVP or PSG increased morbidity but neither predicted SFSS nor affected survival.
Keywords: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CTP, Child Turcot Pugh; CVP, central venous pressure; GRWR, graft to recipient weight ratio; HAT, hepatic artery thrombosis; INR, International Normalized Ratio; LDLT, living donor liver transplant; MELD, Model for End Stage Liver Disease; MHV, middle hepatic vein; N, total number; P, probability value; PNF, primary non-function; PSG, porto systemic gradient; PVP, portal venous pressure; PVT, portal vein thrombosis; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; SD, standard deviation; SFSS, small for size syndrome; SGOT, serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase; SGPT, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase; cirrhosis; graft recipient weight ratio; small for size syndrome.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Small-for-Size Grafts: Does Size Really Matter?J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2018 Jun;8(2):125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 20. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29892174 Free PMC article.
-
How far can we lower graft-to-recipient weight ratio for living donor liver transplantation under modulation of portal venous pressure?Surgery. 2016 Jun;159(6):1623-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Feb 28. Surgery. 2016. PMID: 26936527
-
Portal venous pressure and proper graft function in living donor liver transplants in 69 patients from an Egyptian center.Ann Saudi Med. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):181-188. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.181. Ann Saudi Med. 2018. PMID: 29848935 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to optimize donor safety with smaller grafts for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012 Jun;17(3):230-4. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32835365b2. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012. PMID: 22569511 Review.
-
Prediction and management of small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025 Feb;31(Suppl):S301-S326. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0870. Epub 2024 Dec 10. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 39657750 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 21;24(23):2441-2456. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i23.2441. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29930466 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of the portal system in liver regeneration: From molecular mechanisms to clinical management.Liver Res. 2024 Jan 25;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2024.01.002. eCollection 2024 Mar. Liver Res. 2024. PMID: 39959033 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring and Prediction of Early Allograft Dysfunction Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Clin Transplant. 2025 Feb;39(2):e70074. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70074. Clin Transplant. 2025. PMID: 39876612 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Limanond P., Raman S., Lassman C. Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living related liver donors: correlation between CT and histologic findings. Radiology. 2004;230(1):276–280. - PubMed
-
- Dahm F., Georgiev P., Clavien P. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transpl. 2005;5(11):2605–2610. - PubMed
-
- Bellomo R., Ronco C., Kellum J., Mehta R., Palevsky P. Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8(4):R204. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kiuchi T., Kasahara M., Uryuhara K. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 1999;67(2):321–327. - PubMed
-
- Liu C., Zhao Y., Lo C., Fan S. Hepatic venoplasty in right lobe live donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2003;9(12):1265–1272. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources