Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;44(1):46-54.
doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011212. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

Messy entanglements: research assemblages in heart transplantation discourses and practices

Affiliations

Messy entanglements: research assemblages in heart transplantation discourses and practices

Margrit Shildrick et al. Med Humanit. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

The paper engages with a variety of data around a supposedly single biomedical event, that of heart transplantation. In conventional discourse, organ transplantation constitutes an unproblematised form of spare part surgery in which failing biological components are replaced by more efficient and enduring ones, but once that simple picture is complicated by employing a radically interdisciplinary approach, any biomedical certainty is profoundly disrupted. Our aim, as a cross-sectorial partnership, has been to explore the complexities of heart transplantation by explicitly entangling research from the arts, biosciences and humanities without privileging any one discourse. It has been no easy enterprise yet it has been highly productive of new insights. We draw on our own ongoing funded research with both heart donor families and recipients to explore our different perceptions of what constitutes data and to demonstrate how the dynamic entangling of multiple data produces a constitutive assemblage of elements in which no one can claim priority. Our claim is that the use of such research assemblages and the collaborations that we bring to our project breaks through disciplinary silos to enable a fuller comprehension of the significance and experience of heart transplantation in both theory and practice.

Keywords: art; cardiology; philosophy; social science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Team photo: working session, September 2016.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Andrew Carnie, drawing, 2012. Courtesy of GV Art London.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Andrew Carnie, A Change of Heart, detail of still from a 2 Channel HD Video, 2012.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Alexa Wright, Heart of the Matter, photo of installation of steel, felt, speaker drivers, infrared distance sensors, custom-built interactive audio interface, 2014.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ingrid Bachmann, photo of The Gift, detail of still from a 2 Channel HD Video, 2014.

References

    1. Shildrick M, McKeever P, Abbey S, et al. . Troubling dimensions of heart transplantation. Med Humanit 2009;35:35–8. 10.1136/jmh.2008.001073 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross H, Abbey S, De Luca E, et al. . What they say versus what we see: "hidden" distress and impaired quality of life in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:1142–9. 10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abbey S, De Luca E, Shildrick M, et al. . Qualitative studies better reflect patient distress versus standardized quality of life questionnaires. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011;30:963–6. - PubMed
    1. Poole JM, Shildrick M, De Luca E, et al. . The obligation to say ’Thank you': heart transplant recipients' experience of writing to the donor family. Am J Transplant 2011;11:619–22. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03419.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mauthner OE, De Luca E, Poole JM, et al. . Heart transplants: Identity disruption, bodily integrity and interconnectedness. Health 2015;19:578–94. 10.1177/1363459314560067 - DOI - PubMed