Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):151-159.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx090.

Quality indicators for care of osteoarthritis in primary care settings: a systematic literature review

Yelena Petrosyan  1 , Yeva Sahakyan  2   3 , Jan M Barnsley  1 , Kerry Kuluski  1   4 , Barbara Liu  5 , Walter P Wodchis  1   6   7
Affiliations

Quality indicators for care of osteoarthritis in primary care settings: a systematic literature review

Yelena Petrosyan et al. Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence of osteoarthritis and the prominence of primary care in managing this condition, there is no systematic summary of quality indicators applicable for osteoarthritis care in primary care settings.

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to identify evidence-based quality indicators for monitoring, evaluating and improving the quality of care for adults with osteoarthritis in primary care settings.

Methods: Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases and grey literature, including relevant organizational websites, were searched from 2000 to 2015. Two reviewers independently selected studies if (i) the study methodology combined a systematic literature search with assessment of quality indicators by an expert panel and (ii) quality indicators were applicable to assessment of care for adults with osteoarthritis in primary care settings. Included studies were appraised using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. A narrative synthesis was used to combine the indicators within themes. Applicable quality indicators were categorized according to Donabedian's 'structure-process-outcome' framework.

Results: The search revealed 4526 studies, of which 32 studies were reviewed in detail and 4 studies met the inclusion criteria. According to the AIRE domains, all studies were clear on purpose and stakeholder involvement, while formal endorsement and use of indicators in practice were scarcely described. A total of 20 quality indicators were identified from the included studies, many of which overlapped conceptually or in content.

Conclusions: The process of developing quality indicators was methodologically suboptimal in most cases. There is a need to develop specific process, structure and outcome measures for adults with osteoarthritis using appropriate methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram for selection of studies for the review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Zhang Y, Jordan JM. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 2010; 26: 355–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pefoyo AJ, Bronskill SE, Gruneir A et al. . The increasing burden and complexity of multimorbidity. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le TK, Montejano LB, Cao Z et al. . Healthcare costs associated with osteoarthritis in US patients. Pain Pract 2012; 12: 633–40. - PubMed
    1. Peat G, McCarney R, Croft P. Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 91–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A et al. . Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ 2003; 326: 816–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding