Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.

Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti  1 , Érica Aranha Suzumura  1 , Ligia Nasi Laranjeira  1 , Denise de Moraes Paisani  1 , Lucas Petri Damiani  1 , Helio Penna Guimarães  1 , Edson Renato Romano  1 , Marisa de Moraes Regenga  1 , Luzia Noriko Takahashi Taniguchi  1 , Cassiano Teixeira  2 , Roselaine Pinheiro de Oliveira  3 , Flavia Ribeiro Machado  4 , Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano  5 , Meton Soares de Alencar Filho  6 , Israel Silva Maia  7 , Eliana Bernardete Caser  8 , Wilson de Oliveira Filho  9 , Marcos de Carvalho Borges  10 , Priscilla de Aquino Martins  11 , Mirna Matsui  12 , Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Tascón  13 , Thiago Simões Giancursi  14 , Nelson Dario Giraldo-Ramirez  15 , Silvia Regina Rios Vieira  16 , Maria da Graça Pasquotto de Lima Assef  17 , Mohd Shahnaz Hasan  18 , Wojciech Szczeklik  19 , Fernando Rios  20 , Marcelo Britto Passos Amato  21 , Otávio Berwanger  1 , Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho  21
Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: The effects of recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration on clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain uncertain.

Objective: To determine if lung recruitment associated with PEEP titration according to the best respiratory-system compliance decreases 28-day mortality of patients with moderate to severe ARDS compared with a conventional low-PEEP strategy.

Design, setting, and participants: Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 120 intensive care units (ICUs) from 9 countries from November 17, 2011, through April 25, 2017, enrolling adults with moderate to severe ARDS.

Interventions: An experimental strategy with a lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration according to the best respiratory-system compliance (n = 501; experimental group) or a control strategy of low PEEP (n = 509). All patients received volume-assist control mode until weaning.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality until 28 days. Secondary outcomes were length of ICU and hospital stay; ventilator-free days through day 28; pneumothorax requiring drainage within 7 days; barotrauma within 7 days; and ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality.

Results: A total of 1010 patients (37.5% female; mean [SD] age, 50.9 [17.4] years) were enrolled and followed up. At 28 days, 277 of 501 patients (55.3%) in the experimental group and 251 of 509 patients (49.3%) in the control group had died (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.42; P = .041). Compared with the control group, the experimental group strategy increased 6-month mortality (65.3% vs 59.9%; HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.38; P = .04), decreased the number of mean ventilator-free days (5.3 vs 6.4; difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.1; P = .03), increased the risk of pneumothorax requiring drainage (3.2% vs 1.2%; difference, 2.0%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 4.0%; P = .03), and the risk of barotrauma (5.6% vs 1.6%; difference, 4.0%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 6.5%; P = .001). There were no significant differences in the length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions and relevance: In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, a strategy with lung recruitment and titrated PEEP compared with low PEEP increased 28-day all-cause mortality. These findings do not support the routine use of lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration in these patients.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01374022.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. All authors received grant support from Program to Support Institutional Development of Universal System (PROADI) from the Brazilian Ministry of Health to conduct the study. Dr Amato also received grants from Timpel S. A. and Medtronic. No other disclosures are reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of Patients in the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial
ARDS indicates acute respiratory distress syndrome; Fio2, fraction of inspired oxygen; MAP, mean arterial pressure; Pao2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure. aPatients could have more than 1 reason for exclusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. 28-Day Mortality in the Lung Recruitment Maneuver With Titrated PEEP Group vs the Low-PEEP Group
PEEP indicates positive end-expiratory pressure.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Effects of the Lung Recruitment Maneuver With Titrated PEEP vs the Low-PEEP Group on Mortality According to Subgroups
The size of data markers is proportional to the inverse of variance. Protocol modification indicates the modification in the experimental group strategy after the 556th patient, with decreases in the pressures and duration of the recruitment maneuver. ARDS indicates acute respiratory distress syndrome; Fio2,fraction of inspired oxygen; Pao2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. ; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group . Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788-800. - PubMed
    1. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, et al. ; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group . Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1293-1304. - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L, Marini JJ, Pesenti A, Quintel M, Mancebo J, Brochard L. The “baby lung” became an adult. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(5):663-673. - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L, Protti A, Caironi P, Carlesso E. Ventilator-induced lung injury: the anatomical and physiological framework. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(10)(suppl):S539-S548. - PubMed
    1. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, et al. . Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(6):347-354. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data