Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Oct 17;114(42):11103-11108.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701544114. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

Short- and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Short- and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions

David J Harding et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

A substantial contributor to prison admissions is the return of individuals recently released from prison, which has come to be known as prison's "revolving door." However, it is unclear whether being sentenced to prison itself has a causal effect on the probability of a subsequent return to prison or on criminal behavior. To examine the causal effect of being sentenced to prison on subsequent offending and reimprisonment, we leverage a natural experiment using the random assignment of judges with different propensities for sentencing offenders to prison. Drawing on data on all individuals sentenced for a felony in Michigan between 2003 and 2006, we compare individuals sentenced to prison to those sentenced to probation, taking into account sentence lengths and stratifying our analysis by race. Results show that being sentenced to prison rather than probation increases the probability of imprisonment in the first 3 years after release from prison by 18 percentage points among nonwhites and 19 percentage points among whites. Further results show that such effects are driven primarily by imprisonment for technical violations of community supervision rather than new felony convictions. This suggests that more stringent postprison parole supervision (relative to probation supervision) increases imprisonment through the detection and punishment of low-level offending or violation behavior. Such behavior would not otherwise result in imprisonment for someone who had not already been to prison or who was not on parole. These results demonstrate that the revolving door of prison is in part an effect of the nature of postprison supervision.

Keywords: crime; incarceration; parole; probation; recidivism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Future prison admission for any reason (A), for technical violations (B), and for a new sentence (C) by prison vs. probation sentence, time since release, and race.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Future felony conviction for any felony (A), for medium or high severity felony (B), and for high severity felony only (C) by prison vs. probation sentence, time since release, and race.

References

    1. Western B. Punishment and Inequality in America. Russell Sage; New York: 2006.
    1. National Research Council . In: The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Travis J, Western B, Redburn FS, editors. The National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2014.
    1. Carson EA, Golinelli D. Prisoners in 2012—Advanced Counts. Bureau of Justice Statistics; Washington, DC: 2013.
    1. Rhodes W, et al. Following incarceration, most released offenders never return to prison. Crime Delinq. 2014;62:1003–1025.
    1. Pew Center on the States . State of Recidivism: The Revolving Door of America's Prisons. The Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington; DC: 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms