Language and Psychosocial Functioning among Deaf Learners with and without Cochlear Implants
- PMID: 28977414
- PMCID: PMC5873730
- DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enx035
Language and Psychosocial Functioning among Deaf Learners with and without Cochlear Implants
Erratum in
-
Language and Psychosocial Functioning among Deaf Learners with and without Cochlear Implants.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018 Apr 1;23(2):187. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eny004. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018. PMID: 29514219 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Various studies have examined psychosocial functioning and language abilities among deaf children with and without cochlear implants (CIs). Few, however, have explored how relations among those abilities might change with age and setting. Most relevant studies also have failed to consider that psychosocial functioning among both CI users and nonusers might be influenced by having language abilities in both signed and spoken language. The present investigation explored how these variables might influence each other, including the possibility that deaf individuals' psychosocial functioning might be influenced differentially by perceived and actual signed and spoken language abilities. Changes in acculturation and quality of life were examined over their first year in college, together with changes in perceived and assessed language abilities. Students with and without CIs differed significantly in some aspects of psychosocial functioning and language ability, but not entirely in the directions expected based on studies involving school-aged deaf students. Participants' cultural affiliations were related as much or more to perceived language abilities as to the reality of those abilities as indicated by formal assessments. These results emphasize the need to consider the heterogeneity of deaf learners if they are to receive the support services needed for personal and academic growth.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Simultaneous communication supports learning in noise by cochlear implant users.Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Jan;18(1):49-56. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1265188. Epub 2016 Dec 23. Cochlear Implants Int. 2017. PMID: 28010675 Free PMC article.
-
Cultural Identity of Young Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants in Comparison to Deaf without Cochlear Implants and Hard-of-Hearing Young Adults.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018 Jul 1;23(3):228-239. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eny007. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018. PMID: 29562365
-
Communication skills of deaf and hard-of-hearing college students: Objective measures and self-assessment.J Commun Disord. 2018 Sep-Oct;75:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 18. J Commun Disord. 2018. PMID: 29957560
-
Spoken Language Bilingualism in the Education of Deaf Learners.Am Ann Deaf. 2023;167(5):727-744. doi: 10.1353/aad.2023.0009. Am Ann Deaf. 2023. PMID: 38661781 Review.
-
d/Deaf and Hard of Hearing Multilingual Learners: The Development of Communication and Language.Am Ann Deaf. 2016 Spring;161(1):17-32. doi: 10.1353/aad.2016.0017. Am Ann Deaf. 2016. PMID: 27156915 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-centered empirical research on ethically relevant psychosocial and cultural aspects of cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular implants - a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Aug 28;24(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00945-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37641094 Free PMC article.
-
Relations of Social Maturity, Executive Function, and Self-Efficacy Among Deaf University Students.Deafness Educ Int. 2018;20(2):100-120. doi: 10.1080/14643154.2018.1474330. Epub 2018 May 17. Deafness Educ Int. 2018. PMID: 31548832 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Theory of Mind in Deaf and Hearing College Students.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2019 Apr 1;24(2):104-118. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eny039. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2019. PMID: 30597037 Free PMC article.
-
Peer Relationship Experiences Of Deaf And Hard-Of-Hearing Adolescents.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Apr 5;25(2):153-166. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz048. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020. PMID: 32048717 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Numerical and Real-World Estimation Abilities of Deaf and Hearing College Students.Deafness Educ Int. 2018;20(2):59-79. doi: 10.1080/14643154.2018.1437238. Epub 2018 Mar 6. Deafness Educ Int. 2018. PMID: 30745858 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Archbold S. (2015). Being a deaf student: Changes in characteristics and needs In Knoors H., & Marschark M. (Eds.), Educating deaf learners: Creating a global evidence base (pp. 23–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
- Arnett J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arnett J. J., & Taber S. (1994). Adolescence terminable and interminable: When does adolescence end? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23, 517–537. doi:0047-2891/94/1000-0517.
-
- Barnard-Brak L., Sulak T. N., Tate A., & Lechtenberger D. A. (2010). Measuring college students’ attitudes toward requesting accommodations: A national multi-institutional study. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 141–147. doi:10.1177/1534508409358900. - DOI
-
- Bat-Chava Y., & Deignan E. (2001). Peer relationships of children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 186–199. doi:10.1093/deafed/6.3.186. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical