Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 1;23(1):28-40.
doi: 10.1093/deafed/enx035.

Language and Psychosocial Functioning among Deaf Learners with and without Cochlear Implants

Affiliations

Language and Psychosocial Functioning among Deaf Learners with and without Cochlear Implants

Marc Marschark et al. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Various studies have examined psychosocial functioning and language abilities among deaf children with and without cochlear implants (CIs). Few, however, have explored how relations among those abilities might change with age and setting. Most relevant studies also have failed to consider that psychosocial functioning among both CI users and nonusers might be influenced by having language abilities in both signed and spoken language. The present investigation explored how these variables might influence each other, including the possibility that deaf individuals' psychosocial functioning might be influenced differentially by perceived and actual signed and spoken language abilities. Changes in acculturation and quality of life were examined over their first year in college, together with changes in perceived and assessed language abilities. Students with and without CIs differed significantly in some aspects of psychosocial functioning and language ability, but not entirely in the directions expected based on studies involving school-aged deaf students. Participants' cultural affiliations were related as much or more to perceived language abilities as to the reality of those abilities as indicated by formal assessments. These results emphasize the need to consider the heterogeneity of deaf learners if they are to receive the support services needed for personal and academic growth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Archbold S. (2015). Being a deaf student: Changes in characteristics and needs In Knoors H., & Marschark M. (Eds.), Educating deaf learners: Creating a global evidence base (pp. 23–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    1. Arnett J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnett J. J., & Taber S. (1994). Adolescence terminable and interminable: When does adolescence end? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23, 517–537. doi:0047-2891/94/1000-0517.
    1. Barnard-Brak L., Sulak T. N., Tate A., & Lechtenberger D. A. (2010). Measuring college students’ attitudes toward requesting accommodations: A national multi-institutional study. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 141–147. doi:10.1177/1534508409358900. - DOI
    1. Bat-Chava Y., & Deignan E. (2001). Peer relationships of children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 186–199. doi:10.1093/deafed/6.3.186. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types