EPA's New Ozone Air Quality Standard: Why Should We Care?
- PMID: 28977755
- DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-557EH
EPA's New Ozone Air Quality Standard: Why Should We Care?
Similar articles
-
Policy: EPA's ground-level ozone standard redux.Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Mar;118(3):A 115. doi: 10.1289/ehp.118-a115. Environ Health Perspect. 2010. PMID: 20194066 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Atmospheric Science. China blamed for U.S. ozone.Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1233. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6202.1233. Science. 2014. PMID: 25214586 No abstract available.
-
A decent proposal? EPA's new clean air standards.Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Apr;105(4):378-83. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105378. Environ Health Perspect. 1997. PMID: 9189700 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Establishing policy relevant background (PRB) ozone concentrations in the United States.Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 15;45(22):9484-97. doi: 10.1021/es2022818. Epub 2011 Oct 21. Environ Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 21985705 Review.
-
What Are the Net Benefits of Reducing the Ozone Standard to 65 ppb? An Alternative Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 26;15(8):1586. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081586. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30049975 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Estimating the Health-Related Costs of 10 Climate-Sensitive U.S. Events During 2012.Geohealth. 2019 Sep 17;3(9):245-265. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000202. eCollection 2019 Sep. Geohealth. 2019. PMID: 32159045 Free PMC article.
-
Ozone and childhood respiratory health: A primer for US pediatric providers and a call for a more protective standard.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 May;58(5):1355-1366. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26368. Epub 2023 Mar 8. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023. PMID: 36815617 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials