Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 18;8(40):68899-68915.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20324. eCollection 2017 Sep 15.

Metabolomic biomarkers of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis study

Affiliations

Metabolomic biomarkers of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis study

Khyati Y Mehta et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive disease with high mortality rates, however, there is no blood test for early detection and diagnosis of this disease. Several research groups have reported on metabolomics based clinical investigations to identify biomarkers of PC, however there is a lack of a centralized metabolite biomarker repository that can be used for meta-analysis and biomarker validation. Furthermore, since the incidence of PC is associated with metabolic syndrome and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there is a need to uncouple these common metabolic dysregulations that may otherwise diminish the clinical utility of metabolomic biosignatures. Here, we attempted to externally replicate proposed metabolite biomarkers of PC reported by several other groups in an independent group of PC subjects. Our study design included a T2DM cohort that was used as a non-cancer control and a separate cohort diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), as a cancer disease control to eliminate possible generic biomarkers of cancer. We used targeted mass spectrometry for quantitation of literature-curated metabolite markers and identified a biomarker panel that discriminates between normal controls (NC) and PC patients with high accuracy. Further evaluation of our model with CRC, however, showed a drop in specificity for the PC biomarker panel. Taken together, our study underscores the need for a more robust study design for cancer biomarker studies so as to maximize the translational value and clinical implementation.

Keywords: biomarkers; metabolomics; pancreatic cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no competing conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Boxplots for the ten metabolite panel
Group separation based on normalized abundance of the ten dysregulated metabolites in PC as compared to NC. Solid line represents median value.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for PC (n = 59) vs NC (n = 48) using the ten metabolite panel yields AUC = 0.992
Figure 3
Figure 3. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CRC (n = 66) vs NC (n = 48) using the ten metabolite panel yields AUC = 0.986
Figure 4
Figure 4. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for T2DM (n = 19) vs NC (n = 48) using the ten metabolite panel yields AUC = 0.957
Figure 5
Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CRC (n = 66) vs PC (n = 59) using the ten metabolite panel yields AUC = 0.653
Figure 6
Figure 6. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve T2DM (n = 19) vs PC (n = 59) using the ten metabolite panel yields AUC = 0.997
Figure 7
Figure 7. Boxplot depiction of the plasma 10 metabolite index (P10MI)
Solid black horizontal line within the boxplots represents mean value.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and for PC (n = 59) vs NC (n = 48) metabolite threonine yields AUC = 0.843
Figure 9
Figure 9. Schema for curating metabolites mined from literature search and meta- analyses

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21387 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krechler T, Horejs J, Ulrych J, Zeman M, Macasek J, Duskova J, Zak A. Current status of pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Cas Lek Cesk. 2011;150:587–93. - PubMed
    1. Matthaios D, Zarogoulidis P, Balgouranidou I, Chatzaki E, Kakolyris S. Molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer and clinical perspectives. Oncology. 2011;81:259–72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334449 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting Cancer Incidence and Deaths to 2030: The Unexpected Burden of Thyroid, Liver, and Pancreas Cancers in the United States. Cancer Research. 2014;74:2913–21. - PubMed
    1. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2004;363:1049–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-673615841-8S - DOI - PubMed