Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 4;3(4):e54.
doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6796.

Twitter and Public Health (Part 2): Qualitative Analysis of How Individual Health Professionals Outside Organizations Use Microblogging to Promote and Disseminate Health-Related Information

Affiliations

Twitter and Public Health (Part 2): Qualitative Analysis of How Individual Health Professionals Outside Organizations Use Microblogging to Promote and Disseminate Health-Related Information

Mark Hart et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: Twitter is the most popular form of microblogging that is being utilized in public health to engage audiences and to communicate health-related information. Although there is some research showing the various forms of Twitter use in public health, little is known about how individual public health professionals are using their personal Twitter accounts to disseminate health information.

Objective: The purpose of this research was to categorize public health professionals' tweets to evaluate how individual public health professionals are furthering the mission of public health.

Methods: Twitter accounts held by public health professionals were identified, and researchers proceeded to record 6 months' worth of each individual's Twitter feed. During the 6-month period, a total of 15,236 tweets were collected and analyzed using the constant comparison method.

Results: A total of 23 tweet categories among the 15,236 tweets were initially identified. Some of the most common topics among the 23 categories included the following: health nutrition (n=2008), conferences (n=815), Ebola (n=789), Affordable Care Act (ACA)/health care (n=627), and social justice (n=626). Each of these categories were then stratified into one of four themes: (1) informing and educating, (2) monitoring health statuses and trends, (3) social justice, and (4) professional development.

Conclusions: Using Twitter, public health professionals are helping dispel misinformation through education and by translating technical research into lay terms, advocating for health inequalities, and using it as a means to promote professional development.

Keywords: Twitter; diffusion of innovation; public health; social media; technology transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Public health professional dispels panic and myths during Ebola panic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Public health professional dispels misinformation about the Affordable Care Act.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Public health professional disseminates information about flu epidemic.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Public health professional shares a study about cigarettes with followers.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Public health professional speaks about US poverty.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Public health professional shows support for an organization.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Public health professional shares his/herconference experience.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Public health professional shares a photo of a conference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hart Mark, Stetten Nichole E, Islam Sabrina, Pizarro Katherine. Twitter and Public Health (Part 1): How Individual Public Health Professionals Use Twitter for Professional Development. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Sep 20;3(3):e60. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6795. http://publichealth.jmir.org/2017/3/e60/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pew Internet. 2017. Social Media Fact Sheet http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/ 6l2EoOhdd
    1. Perrin A. Pew Internet. 2015. Social Media Usage: 2005-2015 http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/social-networking-usage-2005-2015/ 6l5SIQ00P
    1. Java A, Song X, Finin T, Tseng B. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis; WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07; 2007 Aug 12; San Jose, CA. 2007. pp. 56–65. - DOI
    1. Veltri GA. Microblogging and nanotweets: Nanotechnology on Twitter. Public Underst Sci. 2013 Oct;22(7):832–49. doi: 10.1177/0963662512463510. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources