Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep 15:11:1683-1688.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S147011. eCollection 2017.

Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature

Majid Moshirfar et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Four cases of corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) have been reported. In this review, we provide an overview of the published literature on corneal ectasia after SMILE and risk factors associated with this complication.

Methods: Case reports were identified by a search of seven electronic databases for pertinent heading terms between 2011 and July 2017. We identified patient characteristics and surgical details including preoperative topography, central corneal thickness, and anterior keratometry (Km). Residual stromal bed (RSB) values not reported were computed using VisuMax ReLEx SMILE software Version 2.10.10. Preoperative ectasia risk was measured using the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS). Percent tissue alteration was calculated for each patient as described by Santhiago et al.

Results: Seven eyes of four patients developed corneal ectasia post SMILE. Two patients had abnormal topography in both eyes. One patient had abnormal topography in one eye. Only one patient was noted to have normal topography in both eyes and later developed ectasia in one eye in the absence of any known risk factors. The mean Randleman ectasia risk score was 4±3 (range: 1-8). The mean calculated percent tissue altered (PTA) was 38%±6% (range: 30%-47%).

Conclusion: A majority of reported ectasia cases occurred in patients with subclinical keratoconus. These conditions may be exacerbated by SMILE and should be considered absolute contraindications to the procedure. Three patients were identified to have high risk based on the ERSS, and one patient exhibited a PTA ≥40%. We formulated a modification to the current calculation of PTA that takes into account the differences in tissue altered between SMILE and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). More studies are needed to fully quantify the risk of ectasia. For now, we propose adopting the same exclusion criteria used for LASIK in the SMILE procedure until more specific metrics have been validated.

Keywords: Ectasia Risk Score System; SMILE; ectasia; keratoconus; percent tissue altered; small-incision lenticule extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of SMILE incision and LASIK flap incision with respect to the corneal limbus. Notes: SMILE cap circumference and small-incision length exhibited using a conventional diameter of 7.5 mm and hinge angle of 90°. LASIK flap circumference and flap incision length exhibited using a flap diameter of 8.75 mm and hinge angle of 55°. Abbreviations: SMILE, small-incision lenticule extraction; LASIK, laser in situ keratomileusis.

References

    1. Seiler T. Iatrogenic corneal ectasia after LASIK – is the end in sight? Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005;222(5):429. - PubMed
    1. Rad AS, Jabbarvand M, Saifi N. Progressive keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2004;20(5 suppl):S718–S722. - PubMed
    1. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis NI. Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(11):1796–1802. - PubMed
    1. Randleman JB. Evaluating risk factors for ectasia: what is the goal of assessing risk? J Refract Surg. 2010;26(4):236–237. - PubMed
    1. Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):267–275. - PubMed