Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 15;9(9):372-378.
doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i9.372.

En bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy and right hemicolectomy for locally advanced right-sided colon cancer

Affiliations

En bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy and right hemicolectomy for locally advanced right-sided colon cancer

Yuji Kaneda et al. World J Gastrointest Oncol. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the usefulness of en bloc right hemicolectomy with pancreaticoduodenectomy (RHCPD) for locally advanced right-sided colon cancer (LARCC).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the database of Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, between January 2009 and December 2016. During this time, 299 patients underwent radical right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer. Among them, 5 underwent RHCPD for LARCC with tumor infiltration to adjacent organs. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was routinely performed to evaluate local tumor infiltration into adjacent organs. During the operation, we evaluated the resectability and the amount of infiltration into the adjacent organs without dissecting the adherent organs from the cancer. When we confirmed that radical resection was feasible and could lead to R0 resection, we performed RHCPD. The clinical data were carefully reviewed, and the demographic variables, intraoperative data, and postoperative parameters were recorded.

Results: The median age of the 5 patients who underwent RHCPD for LARCC was 70 years. The tumors were located in the ascending colon (three patients) and transverse colon (two patients). Preoperative CT revealed infiltration of the tumor into the duodenum in all patients, the pancreas in four patients, the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) in two patients, and tumor thrombosis in the SMV in one patient. We performed RHCPD plus SMV resection in three patients. Major postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (60%) as pancreatic fistula (grade B and grade C, according to International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition) and delayed gastric empty. None of the patients died during their hospital stay. A histological examination confirmed malignant infiltration into the duodenum and/or pancreas in 4 patients (80%), and no patients showed any malignant infiltration into the SMV. Two patients were histologically confirmed to have tumor thrombosis in the SMV. All of the tumors had clear resection margins (R0). The median follow-up time was 77 mo. During this period, two patients with tumor thrombosis died from liver metastasis. The overall survival rates were 80% at 1 year and 60% at 5 years. All patients with node-negative status (n = 2) survived for more than seven years.

Conclusion: This study showed that the long-term survival is possible for patients with LARCC if RHCPD is performed successfully, particularly in those with node-negative status.

Keywords: Inflammatory adhesion; Locally advanced right-sided colon cancer; Malignant infiltration; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Right hemicolectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative computed tomography showing tumor thrombosis in the superior mesenteric vein in Case 5. T: Tumor; TT: Tumor thrombosis; PV: Portal vein; SPV: Splenic vein; SMV: Superior mesenteric vein; J1V: First jejunal vein; J2V: Second jejunal vein.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histological findings revealing tumor thrombosis in the superior mesenteric vein in Case 2 (× 4). SMV: Superior mesenteric vein; TT: Tumor thrombosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curley SA, Carlson GW, Shumate CR, Wishnow KI, Ames FC. Extended resection for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1992;163:553–559. - PubMed
    1. Eldar S, Kemeny MM, Terz JJ. Extended resections for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985;161:319–322. - PubMed
    1. Staniunas RJ, Schoetz DJ Jr. Extended resection for carcinoma of colon and rectum. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73:117–129. - PubMed
    1. Hunter JA, Ryan JA Jr, Schultz P. En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg. 1987;154:67–71. - PubMed
    1. Perez RO, Coser RB, Kiss DR, Iwashita RA, Jukemura J, Cunha JE, Habr-Gama A. Combined resection of the duodenum and pancreas for locally advanced colon cancer. Curr Surg. 2005;62:613–617. - PubMed