Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school
- PMID: 28984374
- PMCID: PMC5765503
- DOI: 10.1111/medu.13462
Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school
Abstract
Context: Thirty years ago, it was suggested in the Edinburgh Declaration that medical school applicants should be selected not only on academic, but also on non-academic, attributes. The main rationale behind extending medical school selection procedures with the evaluation of (non-academic) personal qualities is that this will lead to the selection of students who will perform better as a doctor than those who are selected on the basis of academic measures only. A second rationale is the expectation that this will lead to a representative health workforce as a result of reduced adverse impact. The aims of this paper are (i) to describe what can be learned about the use of selection criteria other than grades from over 15 years of Dutch experience and (ii) to summarise current knowledge on the issue of adverse impact in relation to non-grades-based selection.
Methods: A narrative review was undertaken of the (published) evidence that has resulted from non-grades-based school-specific selection procedures in the Netherlands and from recent explorations of the effect of the use of non-grades-based selection criteria on student diversity.
Results: The Dutch evidence is grouped into five key themes: the effect of participation in voluntary selection procedures, the assessment of pre-university extracurricular activities, the use of work samples, Dutch experiences with situational judgement tests and the effects of changing circumstances. This is followed by several lessons learned for medical schools that aim to increase their student diversity.
Conclusion: Over the last 30 years, important steps towards reliable and valid methods for measuring non-academic abilities have been taken. The current paper describes several lessons that can be learned from the steps taken in the Dutch context. The importance of sharing evidence gathered around the globe and building on this evidence to reach our goal of predicting who will be a good doctor is acknowledged.
© 2017 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Selecting medical students: considering qualities other than academic ability.Med Educ. 2018 Jan;52(1):9-11. doi: 10.1111/medu.13450. Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29265520 No abstract available.
-
The lottery is still an option.Med Educ. 2018 May;52(5):574. doi: 10.1111/medu.13499. Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29672948 No abstract available.
References
-
- World Federation for Medical Education . The Edinburgh Declaration. Med Educ 1988;22 (5):481–2.
-
- Betancourt JR. Eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in health care: what is the role of academic medicine? Acad Med 2006;81:788–92. - PubMed
-
- Cleland J, Dowell J, McLachlan J, Nicholson S, Patterson F. Identifying best practice in the selection of medical students. London: General Medical Council; 2012. http://www.gmc-uk.org/Identifying_best_practice_in_the_selection_of_medi.... [Accessed 28 February 2017.]
-
- Lievens F, Patterson F, Corstjens J, Martin S, Nicholson S. Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT. Med Educ 2016;50 (6):624–36. - PubMed
-
- Mathers J, Parry J. Why are there so few working‐class applicants to medical schools? Learning from the success stories. Med Educ 2009;43 (3):219–28. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
