Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;52(1):86-95.
doi: 10.1111/medu.13462. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school

Affiliations

Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school

Karen M Stegers-Jager. Med Educ. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Context: Thirty years ago, it was suggested in the Edinburgh Declaration that medical school applicants should be selected not only on academic, but also on non-academic, attributes. The main rationale behind extending medical school selection procedures with the evaluation of (non-academic) personal qualities is that this will lead to the selection of students who will perform better as a doctor than those who are selected on the basis of academic measures only. A second rationale is the expectation that this will lead to a representative health workforce as a result of reduced adverse impact. The aims of this paper are (i) to describe what can be learned about the use of selection criteria other than grades from over 15 years of Dutch experience and (ii) to summarise current knowledge on the issue of adverse impact in relation to non-grades-based selection.

Methods: A narrative review was undertaken of the (published) evidence that has resulted from non-grades-based school-specific selection procedures in the Netherlands and from recent explorations of the effect of the use of non-grades-based selection criteria on student diversity.

Results: The Dutch evidence is grouped into five key themes: the effect of participation in voluntary selection procedures, the assessment of pre-university extracurricular activities, the use of work samples, Dutch experiences with situational judgement tests and the effects of changing circumstances. This is followed by several lessons learned for medical schools that aim to increase their student diversity.

Conclusion: Over the last 30 years, important steps towards reliable and valid methods for measuring non-academic abilities have been taken. The current paper describes several lessons that can be learned from the steps taken in the Dutch context. The importance of sharing evidence gathered around the globe and building on this evidence to reach our goal of predicting who will be a good doctor is acknowledged.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. World Federation for Medical Education . The Edinburgh Declaration. Med Educ 1988;22 (5):481–2.
    1. Betancourt JR. Eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in health care: what is the role of academic medicine? Acad Med 2006;81:788–92. - PubMed
    1. Cleland J, Dowell J, McLachlan J, Nicholson S, Patterson F. Identifying best practice in the selection of medical students. London: General Medical Council; 2012. http://www.gmc-uk.org/Identifying_best_practice_in_the_selection_of_medi.... [Accessed 28 February 2017.]
    1. Lievens F, Patterson F, Corstjens J, Martin S, Nicholson S. Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT. Med Educ 2016;50 (6):624–36. - PubMed
    1. Mathers J, Parry J. Why are there so few working‐class applicants to medical schools? Learning from the success stories. Med Educ 2009;43 (3):219–28. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources