A comparative study of the effect of the intrusion arch and straight wire mechanics on incisor root resorption: A randomized, controlled trial
- PMID: 28985106
- PMCID: PMC8315715
- DOI: 10.2319/06417-424R
A comparative study of the effect of the intrusion arch and straight wire mechanics on incisor root resorption: A randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To analyze and compare external apical root resorption (EARR) of maxillary incisors treated by intrusion arch or continuous archwire mechanics.
Materials and methods: This cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study analyzed 28 deep bite patients in the permanent dentition who were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, 12 patients with initial mean age of 15.1 ± 1.6 years and mean overbite of 4.6 ± 1.2 mm treated with the Connecticut intrusion arch (CIA) in the upper arch (Ortho Organizers, Carlsbad, Calif) for a mean period of 5.8 ± 1.27 months. Group 2, 16 patients with initial mean age of 22.1 ± 5.7 years and mean overbite of 4.1 ± 1.1 mm treated with conventional leveling and alignment using continuous archwire mechanics for 6.1 ± 0.81 months. The degree of EARR was detected in 112 maxillary incisors by using CBCT scans and a three-dimensional program (Dolphin 11.7, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif). The CBCT scans were obtained before (T1) and 6 months after initiation of treatment (T2). Differences between and within groups were assessed by nonpaired and paired t-tests, respectively, with a 5% significance level.
Results: Significant differences were found for both groups between T1 and T2 ( P < .05) indicating that EARR occurred in both groups. However, there were no significant differences when EARR was compared between group 1 (-0.76 mm) and group 2 (-0.59 mm).
Conclusions: The Connecticut intrusion arch did not lead to greater EARR of maxillary incisors when compared with conventional orthodontic mechanics.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Intrusion; Overbite; Root resorption; Tomography.
Figures
Comment in
-
Letters From Our Readers.Angle Orthod. 2019 Jan;89(1):163. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219-89.1.163. Angle Orthod. 2019. PMID: 30702940 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Letters From Our Readers.Angle Orthod. 2019 Jan;89(1):164-165. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219-89.1.164. Angle Orthod. 2019. PMID: 30702941 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:1–22. - PubMed
-
- Nielsen IL. Vertical malocclusions: etiology, development, diagnosis and some aspects of treatment. Angle Orthod. 1991;61:247–260. - PubMed
-
- Nanda R. Correction of deep overbite in adults. Dent Clin North Am. 1997;41(1):67–87. - PubMed
-
- Nanda R. Esthetics and Biomechanics in Orthodontics 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier/Saunders;; 2015.
-
- Nanda R, Marzban R, Kuhlberg A. The Connecticut intrusion arch. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:708–715. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
