Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 12;31(2):178-187.
doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx157.

ECG Voltage in Relation to Peripheral and Central Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Affiliations

ECG Voltage in Relation to Peripheral and Central Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Wen-Yi Yang et al. Am J Hypertens. .

Abstract

Background: The heart ejects in the central elastic arteries. No previous study in workers described the diurnal profile of central blood pressure (BP) or addressed the question whether electrocardiogram (ECG) indexes are more closely associated with central than peripheral BP.

Methods: In 177 men (mean age, 29.1 years), we compared the associations of ECG indexes with brachial and central ambulatory BP, measured over 24 hours by the validated oscillometric Mobil-O-Graph 24h PWA monitor.

Results: From wakefulness to sleep, as documented by diaries, systolic/diastolic BP decreased by 11.7/13.1 mm Hg peripherally and 9.3/13.6 mm Hg centrally, whereas central pulse pressure (PP) increased by 4.3 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). Over 24 hours and the awake and asleep periods, the peripheral-minus-central differences in systolic/diastolic BPs averaged 11.8/-1.6, 12.7/-1.8, and 10.3/-1.2 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.0001). Cornell voltage and index averaged 1.18 mV and 114.8 mV·ms. Per 1-SD increment in systolic/diastolic BP, the Cornell voltages were 0.104/0.086 mV and 0.082/0.105 mV higher in relation to brachial 24-hour and asleep BP and 0.088/0.90 mV and 0.087/0.107 mV higher in relation to central BP. The corresponding estimates for the Cornell indexes were 9.6/8.6 and 8.2/10.5 mV·ms peripherally and 8.6/8.9 and 8.8/10.7 mV·ms centrally. The regression slopes (P ≥ 0.067) and correlation coefficients (P ≥ 0.088) were similar for brachial and central BP. Associations of ECG measurements with awake BP and PP were not significant.

Conclusions: Peripheral and central BPs run in parallel throughout the day and are similarly associated with the Cornell voltage and index.

Keywords: ECG voltage; ambulatory blood pressure; blood pressure; blood pressure monitoring; central blood pressure; clinical science; hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diurnal profiles in 177 study participants of central systolic pressure (a), central diastolic pressure (b), central pulse pressure (c), and heart rate (d). Plotted values are 2 hourly mean with 95% confidence interval. P values are for the comparison between awake and asleep averages.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The Cornell voltage (a) and index (b) plotted against peripheral and central systolic 24-hour blood pressure (SBP). The data markers are averages by sixths of the distributions of ECG indexes. The lines are the slopes of the ECG indexes on peripheral and central SBP averaged by sixths of the distributions of the ECG indexes. Pperipheral and Pcentral indicate the corresponding significance levels. Pdifference is the significance of the difference between the slopes for peripheral and central SBP. Abbreviation: BP, blood pressure; ECG, electrocardiogram; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Correlations of Cornell voltage (a) and index (b) with 24-hour and asleep systolic and diastolic pressures. Data markers and whiskers represent the point estimates of the correlation coefficients and their 95% confidence interval, respectively. P values derived by the Hotelling–William test denote the significance of the pairwise comparison of peripheral (open symbols) vs. central (closed symbols) blood pressure. Abbreviation: BP, blood pressure.

Comment in

References

    1. Wei W, Tölle M, Zidek W, van der Giet M. Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device. Blood Press Monit 2010; 15:225–228. - PubMed
    1. Wassertheurer S, Kropf J, Weber T, van der Giet M, Baulmann J, Ammer M, Hametner B, Mayer CC, Eber B, Magometschnigg D. A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: comparison with a common tonometric method. J Hum Hypertens 2010; 24:498–504. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luzardo L, Lujambio I, Sottolano M, da Rosa A, Thijs L, Noboa O, Staessen JA, Boggia J. 24-H ambulatory recording of aortic pulse wave velocity and central systolic augmentation: a feasibility study. Hypertens Res 2012; 35:980–987. - PubMed
    1. Weber T, Wassertheurer S, Rammer M, Maurer E, Hametner B, Mayer CC, Kropf J, Eber B. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension 2011; 58:825–832. - PubMed
    1. Kollias A, Lagou S, Zeniodi ME, Boubouchairopoulou N, Stergiou GS. Association of central versus brachial blood pressure with target-organ damage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 2016; 67:183–190. - PubMed

Publication types