Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 16;35(1):13-21.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx067.

Exploring the impact and use of patients' feedback about their care experiences in general practice settings-a realist synthesis

Deborah J Baldie  1   2 , Bruce Guthrie  3 , Vikki Entwistle  4 , Thilo Kroll  5
Affiliations

Exploring the impact and use of patients' feedback about their care experiences in general practice settings-a realist synthesis

Deborah J Baldie et al. Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Policy encourages health care providers to listen and respond to feedback from patients, expecting that it will enhance care experiences. Enhancement of patients' experiences may not yet be a reality, particularly in primary health care settings.

Objective: To identify the issues that influence the use and impact of feedback in this context.

Design and setting: A realist synthesis of studies of the use of patient feedback within primary health care settings.

Methods: Structured review of published studies between 1971 and January 2015.

Results: Eighteen studies were reported in 20 papers. Eleven studies reported patient survey scores as a primary outcome. There is little evidence that formal patient feedback led to enhanced experiences. The likelihood of patient feedback to health care staff stimulating improvements in future patients' experiences appears to be influenced predominantly by staff perceptions of the purpose of such feedback; the validity and type of data that is collected; and where, when and how it is presented to primary health care teams or practitioners and teams' capacity to change.

Conclusions: There is limited research into how patient feedback has been used in primary health care practices or its usefulness as a stimulant to improve health care experience. Using a realist synthesis approach, we have identified a number of contextual and intervention-related factors that appear to influence the likelihood that practitioners will listen to, act on and achieve improvements in patient experience. Consideration of these may support research and improvement work in this area.

Keywords: Access and evaluation; health care; health care quality; patient advocacy; patient satisfaction; quality assurance; quality of health care; total quality management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Initial programme theory.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Literature review flowchart.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Refined programme theory.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Proposed CMO—how patient feedback leads to improvements in future patients’ experiences of care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Marshall MN, Romano PS, Davies HT. How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care?Int J Qual Health Care 2004; 16 (suppl 1): i57–63. - PubMed
    1. The Scottish Government. Implementing the quality strategy for NHSScotland in primary care. In: DoH (ed). Edinburgh, UK, 2010. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/321597/0103382.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2017).
    1. Darzi A. High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London, UK: DoH, 2008.
    1. NHS Scotland. Partnerships for Care: Scotland’s Health White Paper. 2003. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/47032/0013897.pdf (accessed on 23 June 2017).
    1. The Scottish Government. Better Health, Better Care: Action Plan. 2007. http://1nj5ms2lli5hdggbe3mm7ms5.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2010/03/pn... (accessed on 11 July 2017).

Publication types