Association between preconception maternal beverage intake and in vitro fertilization outcomes
- PMID: 28985907
- PMCID: PMC5716855
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.007
Association between preconception maternal beverage intake and in vitro fertilization outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To study whether maternal intake of beverage type affects IVF outcomes.
Design: A prospective study.
Setting: Tertiary, university-affiliated center.
Patient(s): Three hundred forty women undergoing IVF from 2014 through 2016 for infertility as well as for pregenetic diagnosis for autosomal recessive diseases were enrolled during ovarian stimulation and completed a questionnaire describing their usual beverage consumption.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): IVF outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Total caffeine intake was estimated by summing the caffeine content for specific beverages multiplied by frequency of intake. Associations between specific types of beverages and IVF outcomes were analyzed using Poisson and logistic regression models adjusting for possible confounders.
Result(s): Higher intake of sugared soda was associated with lower total, mature, and fertilized oocytes and top-quality embryos after ovarian stimulation. Women who consumed sugared soda had, on average, 1.1 fewer oocytes retrieved, 1.2 fewer mature oocytes retrieved, 0.6 fewer fertilized oocytes, and 0.6 fewer top-quality embryos compared with women who did not consume sugared soda. Furthermore, compared with women who did not drink sugared soda, the adjusted difference in percent of cycles resulting in live birth for women consuming 0.1-1 cups/day and >1 cup/day were -12% and -16%, respectively. No associations were found between consumption of coffee, caffeine, or diet sodas and IVF outcome.
Conclusion(s): Sugared beverages, independent of their caffeine content, may be a bigger threat to reproductive success than caffeine and caffeinated beverages without added sugar.
Keywords: IVF; caffeinated beverages; non-caffeinated beverages; sugared soda.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Jack LaLanne got it right.Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):955-956. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.036. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 29202972 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kupka MS, D’Hooghe T, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, Erb K, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human reproduction. 2016;31:233–48. - PubMed
-
- Gormack AA, Peek JC, Derraik JG, Gluckman PD, Young NL, Cutfield WS. Many women undergoing fertility treatment make poor lifestyle choices that may affect treatment outcome. Human reproduction. 2015;30:1617–24. - PubMed
-
- Homan GF, Davies M, Norman R. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:209–23. - PubMed
-
- Hornstein MD. Lifestyle and IVF Outcomes. Reproductive sciences. 2016;23:1626–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
