Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jul;27(7):512-520.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006761. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

Improving admission medication reconciliation with pharmacists or pharmacy technicians in the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving admission medication reconciliation with pharmacists or pharmacy technicians in the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial

Joshua M Pevnick et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Admission medication history (AMH) errors frequently cause medication order errors and patient harm.

Objective: To quantify AMH error reduction achieved when pharmacy staff obtain AMHs before admission medication orders (AMO) are placed.

Methods: This was a three-arm randomised controlled trial of 306 inpatients. In one intervention arm, pharmacists, and in the second intervention arm, pharmacy technicians, obtained initial AMHs prior to admission. They obtained and reconciled medication information from multiple sources. All arms, including the control arm, received usual AMH care, which included variation in several common processes. The primary outcome was severity-weighted mean AMH error score. To detect AMH errors, all patients received reference standard AMHs, which were compared with intervention and control group AMHs. AMH errors and resultant AMO errors were independently identified and rated by ≥2 investigators as significant, serious or life threatening. Each error was assigned 1, 4 or 9 points, respectively, to calculate severity-weighted AMH and AMO error scores for each patient.

Results: Patient characteristics were similar across arms (mean±SD age 72±16 years, number of medications 15±7). Analysis was limited to 278 patients (91%) with reference standard AMHs. Mean±SD AMH errors per patient in the usual care, pharmacist and technician arms were 8.0±5.6, 1.4±1.9 and 1.5±2.1, respectively (p<0.0001). Mean±SD severity-weighted AMH error scores were 23.0±16.1, 4.1±6.8 and 4.1±7.0 per patient, respectively (p<0.0001). These AMH errors led to a mean±SD of 3.2±2.9, 0.6±1.1 and 0.6±1.1 AMO errors per patient, and mean severity-weighted AMO error scores of 6.9±7.2, 1.5±2.9 and 1.2±2.5 per patient, respectively (both p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Pharmacists and technicians reduced AMH errors and resultant AMO errors by over 80%. Future research should examine other sites and patient-centred outcomes.

Trial registration number: NCT02026453.

Keywords: health services research; healthcare quality improvement; human error; medication reconciliation; pharmacists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JP currently receives funding from the American Society for Health-System Pharmacists Research and Education Foundation to design a toolkit for pharmacists to use in postdischarge medication management.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Workflow Diagram of Admission Medication History (AMH) Processes Occurring During Usual Care and Study Randomization
Common Usual Care Process Variations Italicized and Circumscribed by Dotted Lines *Note that both intervention arms also received usual care processes, subject to process variation
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT Flow Diagram

References

    1. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. Jama. 1995;274(1):29–34. - PubMed
    1. Aspden PWJ, Bootman JL, Cronenwett LR. Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press; 2007.
    1. Cornish PL, Knowles SR, Marchesano R, Tam V, Shadowitz S, Juurlink DN, et al. Unintended medication discrepancies at the time of hospital admission. Archives of internal medicine. 2005;165(4):424–9. - PubMed
    1. Pippins JR, Gandhi TK, Hamann C, Ndumele CD, Labonville SA, Diedrichsen EK, et al. Classifying and predicting errors of inpatient medication reconciliation. Journal of general internal medicine. 2008;23(9):1414–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gleason KM, McDaniel MR, Feinglass J, Baker DW, Lindquist L, Liss D, et al. Results of the Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) study: an analysis of medication reconciliation errors and risk factors at hospital admission. Journal of general internal medicine. 2010;25(5):441–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data