Efficacy of adjuvant laser therapy in reducing postsurgical complications after the removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A systematic review update and meta-analysis
- PMID: 28987483
- DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.06.043
Efficacy of adjuvant laser therapy in reducing postsurgical complications after the removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A systematic review update and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The authors updated a previously published systematic review to assess the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on reducing complications after the removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
Types of studies reviewed: The authors searched for randomized clinical trials in which the investigators evaluated the efficacy of LLLT compared with that of placebo or no treatment. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The authors used random effects model meta-analysis and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence.
Results: The authors included 21 studies. There was low-certainty evidence that LLLT results in less pain at 2 days after surgery (mean difference [MD], -1.42 on a 10 point scale; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.18 to -0.67) and moderate certainty that it results in negligibly less pain at 7 days (MD, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.22); moderate-certainty evidence that LLLT has a negligible benefit on reducing trismus at 2 days (MD, -3.42 millimeters; 95% CI, -5.34 to -1.50) and at 7 days after surgery (MD, -2.30 mm; 95% CI, -3.96 to -0.64); lastly, there was moderate-certainty evidence that LLLT results in less postoperative swelling at 2 days (standardized MD, -0.82; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.35) and low-certainty evidence that LLLT results in negligibly less postoperative swelling at 7 days after surgery (standardized MD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.4 to 0.07). Low-quality evidence suggests that LLLT will not cause adverse effects.
Conclusions and practical implications: LLLT probably has negligible benefits but may not result in adverse events. Evidence does not support the use of LLLT in clinical practice to reduce complications after impacted mandibular third-molar surgical extractions.
Keywords: Impacted mandibular third molar; pain; postsurgical complications; swelling; systematic review; trismus.
Copyright © 2017 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of Drainage in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;76(8):1640-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 15. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29625028
-
Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the effect two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT)--intraoral and extraoral--on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of the lower third molar.Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Sep;25(5):641-5. doi: 10.1007/s10103-009-0684-1. Epub 2009 May 31. Lasers Med Sci. 2010. PMID: 19484402 Clinical Trial.
-
The Use of Low-Level Laser Therapy to Reduce Postoperative Morbidity After Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;79(2):313.e1-313.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 17. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33058775
-
Efficacy of a single dose of low-level laser therapy in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar extraction surgery.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;45(3):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Dec 12. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26691932 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the influence of ozone and laser therapies on pain, swelling, and trismus following impacted third-molar surgery.Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Jul;29(4):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1300-y. Epub 2013 Mar 14. Lasers Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 23494104 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Extraoral low-level laser therapy can decrease pain but not edema and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02461-2. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 36127651 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical evaluation of single and repeated sessions of photobiomodulation with two different therapeutic wavelengths for reducing postoperative sequelae after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical study.J Appl Oral Sci. 2021 Nov 15;29:e20210383. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0383. eCollection 2021. J Appl Oral Sci. 2021. PMID: 34787280 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of low power laser in reducing postoperative signs and symptoms after third molar surgery: a triple-blind clinical trial.Braz Dent J. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):158-168. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305413. Braz Dent J. 2023. PMID: 37909639 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Precision Extraction of Lingual Mandibular Supernumerary Teeth Using Dynamic Navigation and High-Speed Handpieces: A Case Report.Am J Case Rep. 2024 Oct 18;25:e945262. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.945262. Am J Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39420538 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized study on the efficacy of real-time dynamic navigation in deep horizontal mandibular third molar extractions.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05016-9. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39415200 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials