Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver: which one shall I use?
- PMID: 28988274
- PMCID: PMC10084395
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1340-z
Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver: which one shall I use?
Abstract
Liver stiffness is now a well-established noninvasive biomarker for assessing fibrosis in chronic liver disease. MRI-based and ultrasound-based dynamic elastography techniques have been introduced for assessment of liver stiffness and useful in clinical staging of hepatic fibrosis. Several different elastography techniques are now available with each method having inherent strengths and limitations. The published literature generally indicates that MR elastography has a higher diagnostic performance and fewer technical failures than ultrasound-based elastography techniques in assessing hepatic fibrosis. There is also significant potential to further develop elastography techniques to implement multiparametric methods that have promise for distinguishing between processes such as inflammation, fibrosis, venous congestion, and portal hypertension that can result in increased liver stiffness. In this commentary, we compare MR and ultrasound elastography methods and their utility in clinical practice.
Keywords: Elastography; Hepatic fibrosis; Liver stiffness; MRI; Shear wave; Ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with ethical standards
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.Ultraschall Med. 2016 Feb;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567037. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Ultraschall Med. 2016. PMID: 26871407
-
Distinguishing between Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis with MR Elastography.Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):694-705. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017160622. Epub 2017 Jan 27. Radiology. 2017. PMID: 28128707 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 2, Diagnostic Performance, Confounders, and Future Directions.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):33-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14553. Epub 2015 Apr 23. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25905762 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 1, Principles and Techniques.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):22-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14552. Epub 2015 Apr 23. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25905647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Liver fibrosis assessment: MR and US elastography.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Sep;47(9):3037-3050. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03269-4. Epub 2021 Oct 23. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022. PMID: 34687329 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Importance of Hepatic Surveillance After Single-Ventricle Palliation: An Interventional Study Validating Liver Elastography.Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s00246-025-03854-0. Online ahead of print. Pediatr Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40229565
-
Liver fibrosis quantification.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Mar;47(3):1032-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03396-y. Epub 2022 Jan 12. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022. PMID: 35022806 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of the Underutilization of Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography in MASLD Patients Without Insurance Coverage.Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jun;70(6):2007-2015. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08992-2. Epub 2025 Mar 19. Dig Dis Sci. 2025. PMID: 40106112 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical studies of magnetic resonance elastography from 1995 to 2021: Scientometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Nov;12(11):5080-5100. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-207. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022. PMID: 36330182 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive imaging biomarkers for liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current and future.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;29(Suppl):S136-S149. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0436. Epub 2022 Dec 12. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 36503205 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, et al. (2002) Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol 97(10):2614–2618 - PubMed
-
- The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group (1994) Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 20(1):15–20 - PubMed
-
- European Association for Study of Liver (2015) EASL-ALEH clinical practice guidelines: non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol 63(1):237–264 - PubMed
-
- Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. (2013) EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications. Ultraschall Med 34(3):238–253 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical