Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul;43(7):1546-1551.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1340-z.

Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver: which one shall I use?

Affiliations
Review

Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver: which one shall I use?

Meng Yin et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Liver stiffness is now a well-established noninvasive biomarker for assessing fibrosis in chronic liver disease. MRI-based and ultrasound-based dynamic elastography techniques have been introduced for assessment of liver stiffness and useful in clinical staging of hepatic fibrosis. Several different elastography techniques are now available with each method having inherent strengths and limitations. The published literature generally indicates that MR elastography has a higher diagnostic performance and fewer technical failures than ultrasound-based elastography techniques in assessing hepatic fibrosis. There is also significant potential to further develop elastography techniques to implement multiparametric methods that have promise for distinguishing between processes such as inflammation, fibrosis, venous congestion, and portal hypertension that can result in increased liver stiffness. In this commentary, we compare MR and ultrasound elastography methods and their utility in clinical practice.

Keywords: Elastography; Hepatic fibrosis; Liver stiffness; MRI; Shear wave; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest M.Y. has received research grants from NIH (NIBIB: EB017197). She receives royalties from and holds stock in Resoundant. She has intellectual property rights and a financial interest in MR elastography technology. S.K.V. declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, et al. (2002) Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol 97(10):2614–2618 - PubMed
    1. The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group (1994) Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 20(1):15–20 - PubMed
    1. Jung ES, Lee K, Yu E, et al. (2016) Interobserver agreement on pathologic features of liver biopsy tissue in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pathol Transl Med 50(3):190–196 - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Association for Study of Liver (2015) EASL-ALEH clinical practice guidelines: non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol 63(1):237–264 - PubMed
    1. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. (2013) EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications. Ultraschall Med 34(3):238–253 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources