Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec;15(6):521-531.
doi: 10.1007/s11914-017-0410-z.

The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice

Affiliations
Review

The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice

Didier Hans et al. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of the review: There is an increasing body of evidence that the trabecular bone score (TBS), a surrogate of bone microarchitecture extracted from spine DXA, could play an important role in the management of patients with osteoporosis or at risk of fracture. The current paper reviews this published body of scientific literature on TBS and answers the most relevant clinical questions.

Recent findings: TBS has repeatedly been proven to be predictive of fragility fractures, current and future, and this is largely independent of BMD, CRF, and the FRAX, and when used in conjunction with any one of these measures, it consistently enhances their accuracy. There also is a growing body of evidence indicating that the TBS has particular advantages over BMD for specific causes of increased fracture risk, like chronic corticosteroid excess, type-2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, and patients being treated with anti-aromatase and primary hyperparathyroidism, conditions wherein BMD readings are often misleading. TBS enhances performance of the FRAX tool, where its greatest utility appears to lie in its ability to accurately classify those patients whose BMD level lies close to the intervention threshold, aiding in decisions on whether treatment is warranted or not. Furthermore, TBS has also particular advantages over BMD in secondary osteoporosis. While the role of TBS with monitoring could be important as the different molecules impact logically TBS to various degrees, large clinical trials are still needed.

Keywords: Bone mineral density; Clinical risk factors; FRAX; Fracture risk; Osteoporosis; Review; Trabecular bone score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Oct;29(5):951-957 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jan;27(1):127-33 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 May;98 (5):1963-70 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Nov;26(11):2762-9 - PubMed
    1. Bone. 2015 Sep;78:216-24 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances