Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;17(5):207-213.
doi: 10.1177/1757177416655472. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

Infection risks associated with peripheral vascular catheters

Affiliations
Review

Infection risks associated with peripheral vascular catheters

Li Zhang et al. J Infect Prev. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Peripheral vascular catheters (PVC) are the most frequently used invasive medical devices in hospitals, with 330 million sold each year in the USA alone. One in three UK inpatients at any one time has at least one PVC in situ according to the Scottish National Prevalence survey.

Method: A narrative review of studies describing the infection risks associated with PVCs.

Results: It is estimated that 30-80% of hospitalised patients receive at least one PVC during their hospital stay. Despite their prevalence, PVCs are not benign devices, and the high number of PVCs inserted annually has resulted in serious catheter-related bloodstream infections and significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stay and increased healthcare system costs. To date, PVC infections have been under-evaluated. Most studies focus on central venous catheter rather than PVC-associated bloodstream infections. Risks associated with PVC infection must be addressed to reduce patient morbidity and associated costs of prolonged hospital admission and treatment.

Discussion: This article discusses the sources and routes of PVC-associated infection and outlines known effective prevention and intervention strategies.

Keywords: Catheter-related bloodstream infections; infection control; infection risk; peripheral vascular catheters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Alexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Carr PJ, Frost S, Inwood S, Higgins N, Lin F, Alberto L, Mermel L, Rickard CM. (2015) International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters. Journal of Hospital Medicine 10: 530–533. - PubMed
    1. Assanasen S, Edmond M, Bearman G. (2008) Impact of 2 different levels of performance feedback on compliance with infection control process measures in 2 intensive care units. American Journal of Infection Control 36: 407–413. - PubMed
    1. Bausone-Gazda D, Lefaiver CA, Walters SA. (2010) A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications of 2 peripheral intravenous catheter-stabilization systems. Journal of Infusion Nursing 33: 371–384. - PubMed
    1. Boyd S, Aggarwal I, Davey P, Logan M, Nathwani D. (2011) Peripheral intravenous catheters: the road to quality improvement and safer patient care. Journal of Hospital Infection 77: 37–41. - PubMed
    1. Bugden S, Shean K, Scott M, et al. (2015) Skin Glue Reduces the Failure Rate of Emergency Department-Inserted Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.026. - DOI - PubMed