Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1;8(9):6117-6122.
doi: 10.1039/c7sc01230f. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

On the incompatibility of lithium-O2 battery technology with CO2

Affiliations

On the incompatibility of lithium-O2 battery technology with CO2

Shiyu Zhang et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

When solubilized in a hexacarboxamide cryptand anion receptor, the peroxide dianion reacts rapidly with CO2 in polar aprotic organic media to produce hydroperoxycarbonate (HOOCO2-) and peroxydicarbonate (-O2COOCO2-). Peroxydicarbonate is subject to thermal fragmentation into two equivalents of the highly reactive carbonate radical anion, which promotes hydrogen atom abstraction reactions responsible for the oxidative degradation of organic solvents. The activation and conversion of the peroxide dianion by CO2 is general. Exposure of solid lithium peroxide (Li2O2) to CO2 in polar aprotic organic media results in aggressive oxidation. These findings indicate that CO2 must not be introduced in conditions relevant to typical lithium-O2 cell configurations, as production of HOOCO2- and -O2COOCO2- during lithium-O2 cell cycling will lead to cell degradation via oxidation of organic electrolytes and other vulnerable cell components.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The reaction scheme of peroxide cryptate 1 with CO2 and a line drawing of [O2mBDCA-5t-H6]2– and [CO3mBDCA-5t-H6]2–.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Addition of CO2 to 1 in the presence of an oxygen-atom acceptor.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Variable temperature 13C NMR (left) and 17O NMR (right) analysis of the reaction between 13CO2 and 1.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Possible intermediates during the conversion of 1 and CO2 to 2 (top) and formation of symmetric and unsymmetric peroxydicarbonate (bottom).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Experimental (black trace) and simulated (red trace) solid-state 17O NMR spectra of (a) 1-17O2, (b) 2-CO17O2, and (c) product resulting from the treatment of solid 1-17O2 with CO2. All solid-state 17O NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance-600 (14.1 T) spectrometer under static conditions. A Hahn echo sequence was used for recording the static spectra to eliminate the acoustic ringing from the probe. A 4 mm Bruker MAS probe was used without sample spinning. The effective 90° pulse was of a duration of 1.7 μs. High power 1H decoupling (70 kHz) was applied in all static experiments. A liquid H2O sample was used for both RF power calibration and 17O chemical shift referencing (δ = 0 ppm).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Proposed mechanistic pathways for CO2-mediated solvent decomposition in lithium–O2 batteries. OER is an “oxygen evolving reaction”, HAT is a “hydrogen atom transfer” oxidative process involving hydrogen atom abstraction by carbonate radical anion, and OAT is “oxygen atom transfer” to a substrate, S.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. (a) X-Band EPR spectra of: pristine BMPO in DMF (red), BMPO + 1 without adding CO2 in DMF (purple), and exposure of BMPO + 1 to CO2 in DMF (black). (b) Simulation of the EPR spectra of BMPO + 1 + CO2 in DMF by linear combination of the contribution from: [BMPO–OCO2 (green), [BMPO–OH]˙ (red), and [BMPO–O]˙ (yellow). (c) Formation of [BMPO–O]˙ from [BMPO–OH]˙ and an oxidant “[O]”.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. CO2-mediated oxidation of organic solvents by Li2O2. Addition of excess CO2 to solid Li2O2 in the organic solvent 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) generates an oxidizing equivalent “O”, which converts to O2 (74%) and methyl methoxyacetate (15%) with the remainder unidentified. A similar reaction performed in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) generated dimethylsulfone (DMSO2) in a 90% yield.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bruce P. G., Freunberger S. A., Hardwick L. J., Tarascon J.-M. Nat. Mater. 2011;11:172. - PubMed
    1. Gowda S. R., Brunet A., Wallraff G. M., McCloskey B. D. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013;4:276–279. - PubMed
    1. Lim H.-K., Lim H.-D., Park K.-Y., Seo D.-H., Gwon H., Hong J., Goddard W. A., Kim H., Kang K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:9733–9742. - PubMed
    1. Freunberger S. A., Chen Y., Peng Z., Griffin J. M., Hardwick L. J., Bardé F., Novák P., Bruce P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:8040–8047. - PubMed
    1. Chen Y., Freunberger S. A., Peng Z., Bardé F., Bruce P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:7952–7957. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources