Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 27;4(9):170536.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.170536. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Population cycles emerging through multiple interaction types

Affiliations

Population cycles emerging through multiple interaction types

Naoya Mitani et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

Cyclic dynamics of populations are outstanding and widespread phenomena across many taxa. Previous theoretical studies have mainly focused on the consumer-resource interaction as the driving force for such cycling. However, natural ecosystems comprise diverse types of species interactions, but their roles in population dynamics remains unclear. Here, using a four-species hybrid module with antagonistic, mutualistic and competitive interactions, we analytically showed that the system with major interaction types can drive population cycles. Stronger interactions easily cause cycling, and even when sub-modules with possible combinations of two interactions are stabilized by weak interactions, the system with all interaction types can cause unstable population oscillations. Diversity of interaction types allows to add mutualists to the list of drivers of oscillations in a focal species' population size, when they act in conjunction to other drivers.

Keywords: competition; cycling; mathematical model; mutualism; predator–prey; stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Dynamics of population sizes. Illustrations along the upper side of the panels indicate the community modules that cause each population dynamics. The signs within the linking lines indicate the antagonistic (±), mutualistic (+) and competitive (–) interaction types. Colours indicate different species. Parameter values are: rX = rZ = rW = 1, g = 0.25, d = 0.05, hX = hZ = 1, a = 1.8, u = 3, v = 2, α = 0.2 and β = 0.7. We chose this to satisfy the condition under which the sub-modules are under stable equilibrium, but the mixture of such modules causes instability (in equations (3.1)–(3.4)). Even if the strong symmetrical parameter values are relaxed, the same hybrid effect can be found if these inequalities are balanced.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effects of interspecific competition on the amplitudes and coefficient of variation of population oscillations. The amplitude (solid line) and coefficient of variation (dashed line) of population oscillation were calculated after using the dynamic approach to asymptotic behaviours, with varying competition coefficients. The resource species is used as the index of the amplitude. The tendency was the same regardless of the species used. Parameter values are the same as in figure 1 except for a = 2.5.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Parameter regions indicating stability of the coexistence equilibrium. Coexistence is impossible in the black region. However, the coexistence equilibrium is stable in the white region and unstable (a limit cycle occurs) in the grey region. The values of competition coefficients (non-free parameters) are shown above the panels. Parameter values are the same as in figure 1.

References

    1. Elton CS. 1924. Periodic fluctuations in the numbers of animals: their causes and effects. J. Exp. Biol. 2, 119–163.
    1. Ginzburg L, Colyvan M.. 2003. Ecological orbits: how planets move and populations grow. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    1. de Roos AM, Galic N, Heesterbeek H. 2009. How resource competition shapes individual life history for nonplastic growth: ungulates in seasonal food environments. Ecology 90, 945–960. (doi:10.1890/07-1153.1) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Claessen D, de Roos AM, Persson L. 2000. Dwarfs and giants: cannibalism and competition in size-structured populations. Am. Nat. 155, 219–237. (doi:10.1086/303315) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murdoch W, Kendall B, Nisbet R, Briggs C, McCauley E, Bolser R. 2002. Single-species models for many-species food webs. Nature 417, 541–543. (doi:10.1038/417541a) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources