Intraoperative Awareness and Recall: A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

Background Awareness during general anesthesia is undesired and unanticipated patient wakefulness during surgery or recall of intraoperative events. Incidence of awareness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is significantly higher than the overall incidence of 1% during general surgery. Awareness during cardiac surgery can be prevented by a number of methods. One such method is the supplemental, intraoperative use of sedative agents. Propofol, a bisubstituted phenol, is an intravenous general anesthetic that has been shown to reduce the incidence of awareness. Dexmedetomidine-an alpha₂-adrenergic agonist with anxiolytic, opioid, and general anesthetic-sparing properties-is being considered for maintaining intraoperative depth of anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on depth of anesthesia and to compare it with the effect of propofol in cardiac surgery. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study conducted in a tertiary-care hospital. Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III planned for elective open heart surgery were randomized into two groups of 30 patients each. Each patient of the dexmedetomidine group received an initial loading dose of dexmedetomidine at 1 mcg kg^-1 over 10 minutes followed by infusion at the rate of 0.2-0.6 mcg kg^-1 hr^-1. Patients of the propofol group received propofol infusion at the rate of 0.25^-1 mg kg^-1 hr^-1. An identical technique-of standard general anesthesia and routine physiological monitoring-was used in both groups. Bispectral scores were recorded at predetermined intervals during surgery and the target bispectral index (BIS) was kept at 50±10. The patients were assessed for awareness and recall 24 hours after tracheal extubation using the Brice Questionnaire. Results Intraoperative BIS scores remained within the target range in both groups; however, the BIS scores showed variable trends between the groups and were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.001). None of the patients in either group had recall of intraoperative events. Conclusion Administration of dexmedetomidine was as effective in reducing awareness and recall in cardiac surgery compared to propofol. Thus, dexmedetomidine can be used as an alternative sedative agent to prevent awareness and recall in cardiac surgery.

Keywords: bispectral index; brice questionnaire; cardiac surgery; dexmedetomidine; propofol.

Figure 1. Comparison of BIS scores between study groups

The BIS scores remained below 60 in both groups, indicating adequate depth of anesthesia; however, the dexmedetomidine group had significantly lower BIS scores compared with the propofol group (p<0.001).